The future of negotiations under the climate change COP (Conference of the Parties): Implementation is not enough

Ever since the adoption of the Paris Agreement's rulebook, the United Nations (UN) climate regime has been in an implementation phase. Patchy and weak implementation of the Paris Agreement obligations, however, has led to calls for the Conference of the Parties (COP) to take a more active role in promoting delivery. However, the COP's scope for action is constrained by its limited mandate and unwieldy process. There are potential ways around these constraints, such as leveraging the authority of COP Presidents, reforming the COP, or setting up ‘climate clubs’ outside the COP. However, given that global emissions continue to rise, and ambition also remains insufficient, this commentary argues for a more radical approach: introducing a voting rule, and negotiation under the COP of new optional legal agreements on specific emission sectors and sources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialogues on climate change.
Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29768659241293212
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The future of negotiations under the climate change COP (Conference of the Parties): Implementation is not enough

Joanna Depledge
5 citations
Dialogues on climate change.
Climate Change Policy and Economics
5.65
article

The future of negotiations under the climate change COP (Conference of the Parties): Implementation is not enough

Joanna Depledge
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Ever since the adoption of the Paris Agreement's rulebook, the United Nations (UN) climate regime has been in an implementation phase. Patchy and weak implementation of the Paris Agreement obligations, however, has led to calls for the Conference of the Parties (COP) to take a more active role in promoting delivery. However, the COP's scope for action is constrained by its limited mandate and unwieldy process. There are potential ways around these constraints, such as leveraging the authority of COP Presidents, reforming the COP, or setting up ‘climate clubs’ outside the COP. However, given that global emissions continue to rise, and ambition also remains insufficient, this commentary argues for a more radical approach: introducing a voting rule, and negotiation under the COP of new optional legal agreements on specific emission sectors and sources.

Dialogues on climate change.Vol. 1(1)
University of Cambridge (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
5.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The future of negotiations under the climate change COP (Conference of the Parties): Implementation is not enough — Joanna Depledge · Dialogues on climate change. (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS