A Reanalysis: SRSS-IE Internalizing Cut Scores to Support Data-Informed Decision-Making Efforts in Elementary Schools

We report findings of this replication study, examining the internalizing subscale (SRSS-I4) of the revised version of the Student Risk Screening Scale for Internalizing and Externalizing behavior (SRSS-IE 9) and the internalizing subscale of the Teacher Report Form (TRF). Using the sample from 13 elementary schools across three U.S. states with 195 K–5 students, we replicated the initial data analytic plan used to determine initial cutting scores. Results from logistic regression and receiver operator characteristic curves suggested the following preliminary SRSS-I4 risk categories: 0–1 low, 2 moderate, and 3–12 high risk for internalizing behavior patterns relative to the TRF internalizing subscale score. Results yielded adequate levels of sensitivity and specificity for the first cut, and questionable sensitivity for the upper cut. We planned to conduct subsequent analysis to address the nested nature of the data. Yet, most teachers completed the TRF for one student making this not possible. We discuss limitations and directions for future research, calling for replication with larger samples to facilitate nesting given schoolwide screening practices involve teachers screening multiple students. We also encourage consideration of two risk categories: 0–1 for low and 2+ for a risk category, not distinguishing between moderate- and high-risk categories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Disorders
Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01987429241289912
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Reanalysis: SRSS-IE Internalizing Cut Scores to Support Data-Informed Decision-Making Efforts in Elementary Schools

Katie Scarlett Lane Pelton, Rebecca E. Swinburne Romine, Kathleen Lynne Lane, Mark Matthew Buckman et al.
1 citations
Behavioral Disorders
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
0.79
article

A Reanalysis: SRSS-IE Internalizing Cut Scores to Support Data-Informed Decision-Making Efforts in Elementary Schools

Katie Scarlett Lane Pelton, Rebecca E. Swinburne Romine, Kathleen Lynne Lane, Mark Matthew Buckman, Kandace Fleming, Emily D. Cantwell, Wendy Peia Oakes, Nathan Allen Lane
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We report findings of this replication study, examining the internalizing subscale (SRSS-I4) of the revised version of the Student Risk Screening Scale for Internalizing and Externalizing behavior (SRSS-IE 9) and the internalizing subscale of the Teacher Report Form (TRF). Using the sample from 13 elementary schools across three U.S. states with 195 K–5 students, we replicated the initial data analytic plan used to determine initial cutting scores. Results from logistic regression and receiver operator characteristic curves suggested the following preliminary SRSS-I4 risk categories: 0–1 low, 2 moderate, and 3–12 high risk for internalizing behavior patterns relative to the TRF internalizing subscale score. Results yielded adequate levels of sensitivity and specificity for the first cut, and questionable sensitivity for the upper cut. We planned to conduct subsequent analysis to address the nested nature of the data. Yet, most teachers completed the TRF for one student making this not possible. We discuss limitations and directions for future research, calling for replication with larger samples to facilitate nesting given schoolwide screening practices involve teachers screening multiple students. We also encourage consideration of two risk categories: 0–1 for low and 2+ for a risk category, not distinguishing between moderate- and high-risk categories.

Behavioral DisordersVol. 50(2)
University of Connecticut (US), University of Kansas (US), Olathe Medical Center (US), Arizona State University (US)
National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
0.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.