Comparing the performance of ChatGPT-3.5-Turbo, ChatGPT-4, and Google Bard with Iranian students in pre-internship comprehensive exams

This study aims to measure the performance of different AI-language models in three sets of pre-internship medical exams and to compare their performance with Iranian medical students. Three sets of Persian pre-internship exams were used, along with their English translation (six sets in total). In late September 2023, we sent requests to ChatGPT-3.5-Turbo-0613, GPT-4-0613, and Google Bard in both Persian and English languages (excluding questions with any visual content) with each query in a new session and reviewed their responses. GPT models produced responses at varying levels of randomness. In both Persian and English tests, GPT-4 ranked first and obtained the highest score in all exams and different levels of randomness. While Google Bard scored below average on the Persian exams (still in an acceptable range), ChatGPT-3.5 failed all exams. There was a significant difference between the Large Language Models (LLMs) in Persian exams. While GPT-4 yielded the best scores on the English exams, the distinction between all LLMs and students was not statistically significant. The GPT-4 model outperformed students and other LLMs in medical exams, highlighting its potential application in the medical field. However, more research is needed to fully understand and address the limitations of using these models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-79335-w
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing the performance of ChatGPT-3.5-Turbo, ChatGPT-4, and Google Bard with Iranian students in pre-internship comprehensive exams

Marika Väli, Ali Golestani, K H Farhadi, Mitra Amini et al.
4 citations
Scientific Reports
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.48
article

Comparing the performance of ChatGPT-3.5-Turbo, ChatGPT-4, and Google Bard with Iranian students in pre-internship comprehensive exams

Marika Väli, Ali Golestani, K H Farhadi, Mitra Amini, Soolmaz Zare, Soheil Vafaeian
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study aims to measure the performance of different AI-language models in three sets of pre-internship medical exams and to compare their performance with Iranian medical students. Three sets of Persian pre-internship exams were used, along with their English translation (six sets in total). In late September 2023, we sent requests to ChatGPT-3.5-Turbo-0613, GPT-4-0613, and Google Bard in both Persian and English languages (excluding questions with any visual content) with each query in a new session and reviewed their responses. GPT models produced responses at varying levels of randomness. In both Persian and English tests, GPT-4 ranked first and obtained the highest score in all exams and different levels of randomness. While Google Bard scored below average on the Persian exams (still in an acceptable range), ChatGPT-3.5 failed all exams. There was a significant difference between the Large Language Models (LLMs) in Persian exams. While GPT-4 yielded the best scores on the English exams, the distinction between all LLMs and students was not statistically significant. The GPT-4 model outperformed students and other LLMs in medical exams, highlighting its potential application in the medical field. However, more research is needed to fully understand and address the limitations of using these models.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparing the performance of ChatGPT-3.5-Turbo, ChatGPT-4, and Google Bard with Iranian students in pre-internship comprehensive exams — Marika Väli, Ali Golestani, et al. · Scientific Reports (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS