Is Barbarism the Specific Essence of the Human Kind?

The main scope of the paper is to analyse the concept of barbarism as a key feature of humankind regardless of historical evolution. The approach we propose is a theoretical philosophical analytical one. We will start by discussing barbarism as the specific essence of mankind since ancient times and then move to the deconstruction of the concept under the pressure of human rights in the context of human bio-enhancement. The discussions focus on the fact that freedom becomes a sum of freedoms in the context of law, but while the law comes defends individual and the collective freedoms, it must also be interpreted in the context of the Kantian categorical imperative. However, freedoms viewed through the lens of the natural law and the social contracts presuppose two completely different paradigms. The conclusions are that, if for the current human individual, the meaning of freedom is given by civil and political rights, because of the bio-enhancement technology, the human species could talk about a greater freedom of action or, on the contrary, about a form of large-scale social control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty Philosophy and Humanistic Sciences
Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenphs/11.1sup1/78
Primary Topic
Byzantine Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Barbarism the Specific Essence of the Human Kind?

Adrian Neculai Lăcătuș
Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty Philosophy and Humanistic Sciences
Byzantine Studies and History
article

Is Barbarism the Specific Essence of the Human Kind?

Adrian Neculai Lăcătuș
article en

Abstract

The main scope of the paper is to analyse the concept of barbarism as a key feature of humankind regardless of historical evolution. The approach we propose is a theoretical philosophical analytical one. We will start by discussing barbarism as the specific essence of mankind since ancient times and then move to the deconstruction of the concept under the pressure of human rights in the context of human bio-enhancement. The discussions focus on the fact that freedom becomes a sum of freedoms in the context of law, but while the law comes defends individual and the collective freedoms, it must also be interpreted in the context of the Kantian categorical imperative. However, freedoms viewed through the lens of the natural law and the social contracts presuppose two completely different paradigms. The conclusions are that, if for the current human individual, the meaning of freedom is given by civil and political rights, because of the bio-enhancement technology, the human species could talk about a greater freedom of action or, on the contrary, about a form of large-scale social control.

Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty Philosophy and Humanistic SciencesVol. 11(1(sup1))
Ştefan cel Mare University of Suceava (RO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Byzantine Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is Barbarism the Specific Essence of the Human Kind? — Adrian Neculai Lăcătuș · Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty Philosophy and Humanistic Sciences (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS