Comparative analysis of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math> moments using different phenomenological models

Analysis of normalized <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>C</a:mi></a:math> moments of multiplicity distribution calculated from the different phenomenological models, the Bialas-Praszalowics (BP) model, modified negative binomial and the superposed shifted Gompertz distribution at different center of mass (cms) energies is presented. The analysis covers a range of energies (200–900 GeV) of <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mover accent="true"><c:mi>p</c:mi><c:mo stretchy="false">¯</c:mo></c:mover><c:mi>p</c:mi></c:math> collisions in restricted phase space slices. A comparison of different models to the experimental data on charged particle multiplicity spectra from the <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:mover accent="true"><g:mi>p</g:mi><g:mo stretchy="false">¯</g:mo></g:mover><g:mi>p</g:mi></g:math> annihilation in five pseudorapidity windows is reported. The comparison shows that the two approaches other than the BP model are in better agreement to the data. Results on variation of moments with pseudorapidity window size and with center of mass energy and observations from such a study in <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><k:mover accent="true"><k:mi>p</k:mi><k:mo stretchy="false">¯</k:mo></k:mover><k:mi>p</k:mi></k:math> annihilation and <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><o:mi>p</o:mi><o:mi>p</o:mi></o:math> interactions at the same center-of-mass energy are also presented. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.110.096014
Primary Topic
High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math> moments using different phenomenological models

Jinu James, M. Kaur, R. Aggarwal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
article

Comparative analysis of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math> moments using different phenomenological models

Jinu James, M. Kaur, R. Aggarwal
article en

Abstract

Analysis of normalized <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>C</a:mi></a:math> moments of multiplicity distribution calculated from the different phenomenological models, the Bialas-Praszalowics (BP) model, modified negative binomial and the superposed shifted Gompertz distribution at different center of mass (cms) energies is presented. The analysis covers a range of energies (200–900 GeV) of <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mover accent="true"><c:mi>p</c:mi><c:mo stretchy="false">¯</c:mo></c:mover><c:mi>p</c:mi></c:math> collisions in restricted phase space slices. A comparison of different models to the experimental data on charged particle multiplicity spectra from the <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:mover accent="true"><g:mi>p</g:mi><g:mo stretchy="false">¯</g:mo></g:mover><g:mi>p</g:mi></g:math> annihilation in five pseudorapidity windows is reported. The comparison shows that the two approaches other than the BP model are in better agreement to the data. Results on variation of moments with pseudorapidity window size and with center of mass energy and observations from such a study in <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><k:mover accent="true"><k:mi>p</k:mi><k:mo stretchy="false">¯</k:mo></k:mover><k:mi>p</k:mi></k:math> annihilation and <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><o:mi>p</o:mi><o:mi>p</o:mi></o:math> interactions at the same center-of-mass energy are also presented. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 110(9)
Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (IN), Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IN), Panjab University (IN)
Ministry of Education, India
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.