Differential effect of grassland mowing on arthropod taxa

Abstract Arthropods face a global decline attributed to habitat loss, climate change, pesticide use, and an intensification of land‐use practices such as mowing. Studies on the effects of mowing on arthropod abundance showed conflicting results potentially due to multiple factors, including study design, grassland management, sampling method, and arthropod taxon studied. We conducted four studies in different grasslands, including intensively and extensively used agricultural and urban grasslands, utilising sweep netting, suction sampling, and pitfall traps. We compared the mowing responses of arthropod taxa between those studies at three different taxonomic resolutions (first‐level overall arthropods, second‐level orders, and third‐level families and suborders). First, we discovered that mowing had a negative effect on overall arthropod abundance in all our studies (first level). Second, our four studies found that seven second‐ and third‐level taxa showed only negative, four only positive, and four mixed positive and negative responses. Third, regarding taxonomic resolution, no third‐level taxon reacted differently to mowing compared to the second‐level taxon it belongs to. Our results indicate that for some taxa, mowing has a consistent negative (e.g. Diptera) or positive effects (e.g. Coleoptera). We suggest those groups have uniform phenological traits that make them especially vulnerable to mowing. For taxa showing mixed responses, we expect that study‐dependent factors such as region, sampling method, and grassland management affect their response to mowing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Entomology
Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/een.13400
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differential effect of grassland mowing on arthropod taxa

Michael Staab, Rafael Achury, Robert Künast, Sebastian T. Meyer et al.
2 citations
Ecological Entomology
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
1.38
article

Differential effect of grassland mowing on arthropod taxa

Michael Staab, Rafael Achury, Robert Künast, Sebastian T. Meyer, Iris Schneider, Sebastian Seibold, Wolfgang W. Weisser, Nico Blüthgen, David Mayr, Nils Siegmüller, Martin Westenrieder
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Arthropods face a global decline attributed to habitat loss, climate change, pesticide use, and an intensification of land‐use practices such as mowing. Studies on the effects of mowing on arthropod abundance showed conflicting results potentially due to multiple factors, including study design, grassland management, sampling method, and arthropod taxon studied. We conducted four studies in different grasslands, including intensively and extensively used agricultural and urban grasslands, utilising sweep netting, suction sampling, and pitfall traps. We compared the mowing responses of arthropod taxa between those studies at three different taxonomic resolutions (first‐level overall arthropods, second‐level orders, and third‐level families and suborders). First, we discovered that mowing had a negative effect on overall arthropod abundance in all our studies (first level). Second, our four studies found that seven second‐ and third‐level taxa showed only negative, four only positive, and four mixed positive and negative responses. Third, regarding taxonomic resolution, no third‐level taxon reacted differently to mowing compared to the second‐level taxon it belongs to. Our results indicate that for some taxa, mowing has a consistent negative (e.g. Diptera) or positive effects (e.g. Coleoptera). We suggest those groups have uniform phenological traits that make them especially vulnerable to mowing. For taxa showing mixed responses, we expect that study‐dependent factors such as region, sampling method, and grassland management affect their response to mowing.

Ecological EntomologyVol. 50(2)
Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
1.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.