Hybrid physics-AI outperforms numerical weather prediction for extreme precipitation nowcasting

Precipitation nowcasting, which is critical for flood emergency and river management, has remained challenging for decades, although recent developments in deep generative modeling (DGM) suggest the possibility of improvements. River management centers, such as the Tennessee Valley Authority, have been using Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models for nowcasting, but they have been struggling with missed detections even from best-in-class NWP models. While decades of prior research achieved limited improvements beyond advection and localized evolution, recent attempts have shown progress from so-called physics-free machine learning (ML) methods, and even greater improvements from physics-embedded ML approaches. Developers of DGM for nowcasting have compared their approaches with optical flow (a variant of advection) and meteorologists' judgment, but not with NWP models. Further, they have not conducted independent co-evaluations with water resources and river managers. Here we show that the state-of-the-art physics-embedded deep generative model, specifically NowcastNet, outperforms the High Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model, which is the latest generation of NWP, along with advection and persistence, especially for heavy precipitation events. Thus, for grid-cell extremes over 16 mm/h, NowcastNet demonstrated a median critical success index (CSI) of 0.30, compared with median CSI of 0.04 for HRRR. However, despite hydrologically-relevant improvements in point-by-point forecasts from NowcastNet, caveats include overestimation of spatially aggregate precipitation over longer lead times. Our co-evaluation with ML developers, hydrologists and river managers suggest the possibility of improved flood emergency response and hydropower management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-024-00834-8
Citations
32
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid physics-AI outperforms numerical weather prediction for extreme precipitation nowcasting

Thomas Vandal, Kate Duffy, M. Hicks, Auroop R. Ganguly et al.
32 citations
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
9.04
article

Hybrid physics-AI outperforms numerical weather prediction for extreme precipitation nowcasting

Thomas Vandal, Kate Duffy, M. Hicks, Auroop R. Ganguly, Puja Das, August Posch, Katie van Werkhoven, Debjani Singh, Nathan Barber
article en
32 citations

Abstract

Precipitation nowcasting, which is critical for flood emergency and river management, has remained challenging for decades, although recent developments in deep generative modeling (DGM) suggest the possibility of improvements. River management centers, such as the Tennessee Valley Authority, have been using Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models for nowcasting, but they have been struggling with missed detections even from best-in-class NWP models. While decades of prior research achieved limited improvements beyond advection and localized evolution, recent attempts have shown progress from so-called physics-free machine learning (ML) methods, and even greater improvements from physics-embedded ML approaches. Developers of DGM for nowcasting have compared their approaches with optical flow (a variant of advection) and meteorologists' judgment, but not with NWP models. Further, they have not conducted independent co-evaluations with water resources and river managers. Here we show that the state-of-the-art physics-embedded deep generative model, specifically NowcastNet, outperforms the High Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model, which is the latest generation of NWP, along with advection and persistence, especially for heavy precipitation events. Thus, for grid-cell extremes over 16 mm/h, NowcastNet demonstrated a median critical success index (CSI) of 0.30, compared with median CSI of 0.04 for HRRR. However, despite hydrologically-relevant improvements in point-by-point forecasts from NowcastNet, caveats include overestimation of spatially aggregate precipitation over longer lead times. Our co-evaluation with ML developers, hydrologists and river managers suggest the possibility of improved flood emergency response and hydropower management.

npj Climate and Atmospheric ScienceVol. 7(1)
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), Northeastern University (US), Tennessee Valley Authority (US), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US), RTI International (US), Zen-Noh (Japan) (JP), Triangle (US), Zeus Scientific (United States) (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
9.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.