Ten years on: The Snowy White Peaks of the NHS

Over one-quarter of English National Health Service (NHS) staff are from black and minority ethnic (BME) backgrounds. Peer-reviewed research, grey literature and staff surveys consistently show that the NHS treats such staff less favourably than white staff in recruitment, career progression, bullying, discipline, referrals to professional regulators and the response when BME staff raise concerns.1 Such disadvantage may be compounded for the growing number of overseas trained staff and through intersectional disadvantage, notably for BME female staff. BME staff report exposure to ‘microaggressions’, racist stereotyping, prejudice and overt unfair treatment, and such experiences are associated with low employee satisfaction and greater staff turnover.2 These experiences are associated with emotional problems, somatic symptoms, low job satisfaction and long periods of sickness absence among this workforce.3 Race discrimination adversely impacts access to and the provision of healthcare.4 The NHS response to race discrimination within the NHS has been late, glacial and often performative. In the wake of the Macpherson Inquiry (1998),5 Ministers launched the Race Equality Action Plan (REAP)6 to address the striking absence of BME staff from senior positions. However, when The Snowy White Peaks of the NHS (TSWP) (2014)7 reviewed progress a decade later, there was almost none to be found. A decade further on this commentary considers the impact of that 2014 report. This surveyed London’s NHS Trust leadership. 41% of London’s NHS staff and 45% of the population were of BME heritage, but we found:

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Leader
Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2024-001022
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ten years on: The Snowy White Peaks of the NHS

Roger Kline
2 citations
BMJ Leader
Healthcare Systems and Challenges
1.70
article

Ten years on: The Snowy White Peaks of the NHS

Roger Kline
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Over one-quarter of English National Health Service (NHS) staff are from black and minority ethnic (BME) backgrounds. Peer-reviewed research, grey literature and staff surveys consistently show that the NHS treats such staff less favourably than white staff in recruitment, career progression, bullying, discipline, referrals to professional regulators and the response when BME staff raise concerns.1 Such disadvantage may be compounded for the growing number of overseas trained staff and through intersectional disadvantage, notably for BME female staff. BME staff report exposure to ‘microaggressions’, racist stereotyping, prejudice and overt unfair treatment, and such experiences are associated with low employee satisfaction and greater staff turnover.2 These experiences are associated with emotional problems, somatic symptoms, low job satisfaction and long periods of sickness absence among this workforce.3 Race discrimination adversely impacts access to and the provision of healthcare.4 The NHS response to race discrimination within the NHS has been late, glacial and often performative. In the wake of the Macpherson Inquiry (1998),5 Ministers launched the Race Equality Action Plan (REAP)6 to address the striking absence of BME staff from senior positions. However, when The Snowy White Peaks of the NHS (TSWP) (2014)7 reviewed progress a decade later, there was almost none to be found. A decade further on this commentary considers the impact of that 2014 report. This surveyed London’s NHS Trust leadership. 41% of London’s NHS staff and 45% of the population were of BME heritage, but we found:

BMJ LeaderVol. 9(2)
Middlesex University London (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Healthcare Systems and Challenges
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.