Exploring Perspectives of Basic and Clinical Sciences Medical Students on Research

Objective: To identify and compare motivating factors and obstacles towards research among undergraduate medical students of basic and clinical sciences. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Combined Military Hospital, Kharian medical college, Pakistan Jun to Aug 2021. Methodology: This study involved 205 undergraduate medical students divided into two groups: basic sciences (1st, 2nd, and 3rd year) and clinical sciences (4th year). Data collection was done using a self-structured questionnaire based on a 5-point Likert scale. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional review board (CKMC/IERB/AC-00119). Results: Out of the participants, 84(40.9%) were male and 151(59%) were female. 183(89.2%) were aged 18-22, and 22(10.7%) were aged 23-27. Distribution by year was as follows: 1st year 17%, 2nd year 20.9%, 3rd year 15.6%, and 4th year 46.3%. Approximately 40-50% of clinical sciences students supported making research mandatory from the first to the final year and introducing weightage in the final assessment, foster critical thinking and teamwork, compared to only 2-17% of basic sciences students. This significant difference highlights the need for early integration of research activities in the medical curriculum (p-value<0.001). 40-50% of undergraduate students in both clinical and basic sciences agreed that there is a lack of research culture, infrastructure, training funds, and time. The barriers did not show significant differences between the groups. Conclusion: Clinical students’ perception of research is much better than basic sciences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v74isuppl-2.12287
Primary Topic
Health and Medical Research Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Perspectives of Basic and Clinical Sciences Medical Students on Research

Iffat Noor, Iffat Naiyar, Muhammad Ehsan, Wajeha Najeeb et al.
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Health and Medical Research Impacts
article

Exploring Perspectives of Basic and Clinical Sciences Medical Students on Research

Iffat Noor, Iffat Naiyar, Muhammad Ehsan, Wajeha Najeeb, Aneeqa Chughati, Shehryar Arshid
article en

Abstract

Objective: To identify and compare motivating factors and obstacles towards research among undergraduate medical students of basic and clinical sciences. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Combined Military Hospital, Kharian medical college, Pakistan Jun to Aug 2021. Methodology: This study involved 205 undergraduate medical students divided into two groups: basic sciences (1st, 2nd, and 3rd year) and clinical sciences (4th year). Data collection was done using a self-structured questionnaire based on a 5-point Likert scale. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional review board (CKMC/IERB/AC-00119). Results: Out of the participants, 84(40.9%) were male and 151(59%) were female. 183(89.2%) were aged 18-22, and 22(10.7%) were aged 23-27. Distribution by year was as follows: 1st year 17%, 2nd year 20.9%, 3rd year 15.6%, and 4th year 46.3%. Approximately 40-50% of clinical sciences students supported making research mandatory from the first to the final year and introducing weightage in the final assessment, foster critical thinking and teamwork, compared to only 2-17% of basic sciences students. This significant difference highlights the need for early integration of research activities in the medical curriculum (p-value<0.001). 40-50% of undergraduate students in both clinical and basic sciences agreed that there is a lack of research culture, infrastructure, training funds, and time. The barriers did not show significant differences between the groups. Conclusion: Clinical students’ perception of research is much better than basic sciences.

Pakistan Armed Forces Medical JournalVol. 74(SUPPL-2)
National University of Medical Sciences (PK)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Health and Medical Research Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.