Land cover change in and around South African protected areas

Land cover change and habitat loss are major threats to biodiversity, with protected areas (PAs) playing a crucial role in mitigation. This study compares the natural cover remaining within South Africa's PA network to a 5-km buffer zone around PAs. This comparison acts as an indicator of the imminent threats posed to PAs by nearby land use changes and as a measure of the integrity of natural land cover within them. This is done by comparing satellite-derived land cover classes (natural/semi-natural; agriculture; built-up/mining) collected over three decades within PAs and buffers across various PA sizes, in different biomes and across a rainfall gradient. Results show that South Africa's PAs, which cover nearly 10 % of the country, have more natural land cover than their associated buffer zones. Larger and low-rainfall PAs retain the highest natural cover. However, natural cover drops by 14.8 % just 1 km outside PAs, mirroring the national average natural cover outside PAs. Significant land cover change occurs within the 5-km buffer, especially in high-rainfall areas and around smaller PAs, with the most pronounced changes in the Indian Ocean Coastal Belt, Fynbos, and Grassland biomes. These changes in the buffer limit PA expansion opportunities and pose risks to their integrity. To meet global conservation targets and human needs, setting land aside for conservation must be complemented by additional initiatives. Beyond protecting natural landscapes within, PAs should promote sustainable land use beyond their boundaries. We argue for new area-based conservation measures that balance ecological, social, and financial goals, fostering better integration of conservation and production landscapes. • Protected areas (PA) in South Africa retain significant natural cover within their boundaries. • Land cover directly neighbouring these PAs are more transformed. • Areas neighbouring PAs in high rainfall areas and certain biomes are especially vulnerable to land cover change. • Integrating PAs with surrounding areas requires a social-ecological systems approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Conservation
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110844
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Land cover change in and around South African protected areas

Izak P. J. Smit, Brian W. van Wilgen, Kristal Maze
11 citations
Biological Conservation
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
3.11
article

Land cover change in and around South African protected areas

Izak P. J. Smit, Brian W. van Wilgen, Kristal Maze
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Land cover change and habitat loss are major threats to biodiversity, with protected areas (PAs) playing a crucial role in mitigation. This study compares the natural cover remaining within South Africa's PA network to a 5-km buffer zone around PAs. This comparison acts as an indicator of the imminent threats posed to PAs by nearby land use changes and as a measure of the integrity of natural land cover within them. This is done by comparing satellite-derived land cover classes (natural/semi-natural; agriculture; built-up/mining) collected over three decades within PAs and buffers across various PA sizes, in different biomes and across a rainfall gradient. Results show that South Africa's PAs, which cover nearly 10 % of the country, have more natural land cover than their associated buffer zones. Larger and low-rainfall PAs retain the highest natural cover. However, natural cover drops by 14.8 % just 1 km outside PAs, mirroring the national average natural cover outside PAs. Significant land cover change occurs within the 5-km buffer, especially in high-rainfall areas and around smaller PAs, with the most pronounced changes in the Indian Ocean Coastal Belt, Fynbos, and Grassland biomes. These changes in the buffer limit PA expansion opportunities and pose risks to their integrity. To meet global conservation targets and human needs, setting land aside for conservation must be complemented by additional initiatives. Beyond protecting natural landscapes within, PAs should promote sustainable land use beyond their boundaries. We argue for new area-based conservation measures that balance ecological, social, and financial goals, fostering better integration of conservation and production landscapes. • Protected areas (PA) in South Africa retain significant natural cover within their boundaries. • Land cover directly neighbouring these PAs are more transformed. • Areas neighbouring PAs in high rainfall areas and certain biomes are especially vulnerable to land cover change. • Integrating PAs with surrounding areas requires a social-ecological systems approach.

Biological ConservationVol. 300
South African National Parks (ZA), Stellenbosch University (ZA), Scientific Services (ZA), Nelson Mandela University (ZA)
National Research Foundation
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
3.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.