Infusion vs. Bolus: Phenylephrine for Cesarean Delivery

Systemic hypotension is a frequently encountered effect of spinal anesthesia in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery. It may be particularly hazardous if it leads to uterine hypoperfusion and decelerations of fetal heart rate. Vasoactive medications such as phenylephrine are commonly used to counteract the sympatholytic effect of intrathecal local anesthetic. The literature is lacking in regards to the benefits of a prophylactic continuous infusion of phenylephrine versus bolus administration. Garg and colleagues performed a meta-analysis of 15 studies exploring this question which included 2,153 patients. These studies suggest that using intermittent boluses of phenylephrine results in higher rates of hypotension and vomiting but with a lower incidence of reflexive bradycardia and hypertension. There were no differences seen in fetal outcomes. More studies examining the optimal dosage of continuous phenylephrine infusions and outcomes are needed. A visual summary of this article is presented in this infographic, though the reader is strongly encouraged to review the cited article for a more thorough understanding of the illustrated concepts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Anesthesia & Analgesia
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007311
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Infusion vs. Bolus: Phenylephrine for Cesarean Delivery

Naveen Nathan
Anesthesia & Analgesia
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Infusion vs. Bolus: Phenylephrine for Cesarean Delivery

Naveen Nathan
article en

Abstract

Systemic hypotension is a frequently encountered effect of spinal anesthesia in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery. It may be particularly hazardous if it leads to uterine hypoperfusion and decelerations of fetal heart rate. Vasoactive medications such as phenylephrine are commonly used to counteract the sympatholytic effect of intrathecal local anesthetic. The literature is lacking in regards to the benefits of a prophylactic continuous infusion of phenylephrine versus bolus administration. Garg and colleagues performed a meta-analysis of 15 studies exploring this question which included 2,153 patients. These studies suggest that using intermittent boluses of phenylephrine results in higher rates of hypotension and vomiting but with a lower incidence of reflexive bradycardia and hypertension. There were no differences seen in fetal outcomes. More studies examining the optimal dosage of continuous phenylephrine infusions and outcomes are needed. A visual summary of this article is presented in this infographic, though the reader is strongly encouraged to review the cited article for a more thorough understanding of the illustrated concepts.

Anesthesia & AnalgesiaVol. 139(6)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.