The Implementation of UNDRIP: Legal Dimensions of Indigenous Peoples’ Cultural Heritage and Property in Canada

Canada, both federally and in British Columbia, has formally adopted the United Nations Declaration on Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). Despite Canada’s adoption of UNDRIP, the laws, customs, and practices of Indigenous Peoples are sui generis and must be recognized and applied as such. This article considers the nature of Indigenous culture and heritage and the potential for recognition and protection on a proprietary basis judicially or legislatively — or a combination of both — within the framework of UNDRIP. This article further considers a means of linkage between federal and provincial law on the one hand, and Indigenous peoples’ law, custom, or practice on the other. Lastly, this article examines various or ancillary matters that are essential to establishing justiciability in the recognition and protection of heritage and culture of Indigenous peoples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alberta Law Review
Published
2024-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29173/alr2785
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Implementation of UNDRIP: Legal Dimensions of Indigenous Peoples’ Cultural Heritage and Property in Canada

R.G. Howell, Colton Dennis
1 citations
Alberta Law Review
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
2.92
article

The Implementation of UNDRIP: Legal Dimensions of Indigenous Peoples’ Cultural Heritage and Property in Canada

R.G. Howell, Colton Dennis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Canada, both federally and in British Columbia, has formally adopted the United Nations Declaration on Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). Despite Canada’s adoption of UNDRIP, the laws, customs, and practices of Indigenous Peoples are sui generis and must be recognized and applied as such. This article considers the nature of Indigenous culture and heritage and the potential for recognition and protection on a proprietary basis judicially or legislatively — or a combination of both — within the framework of UNDRIP. This article further considers a means of linkage between federal and provincial law on the one hand, and Indigenous peoples’ law, custom, or practice on the other. Lastly, this article examines various or ancillary matters that are essential to establishing justiciability in the recognition and protection of heritage and culture of Indigenous peoples.

Alberta Law Review
University of British Columbia (CA)
Fondation pour la recherche juridique
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
2.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.