Combustion and Emissions Comparison between a Diesel and a Dimethyl Ether (DME) Off-Highway Compression Ignition Engine

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Dimethyl ether (DME) is a promising substitute for diesel as a fuel in heavy-duty engines. This article presents the comparison between a diesel- and a DME-powered compression ignition engine. The diesel-powered version was initially characterised at a range of operating points before being converted to operate on DME. This was achieved by replacing fuel system components with bespoke DME-compatible engine parts. An off-board fuel pressurisation and conditioning system was designed to replace the existing high-pressure fuel pump, while maintaining all other engine hardware and components.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">Engine behaviour, in terms of combustion and emissions on both fuels was examined. Firstly, the effect of varying recirculated exhaust gas (EGR) concentration at constant excess air ratio, combustion phasing (CA50) and equal fuel delivery rate (by energy input) was interrogated. DME combustion was significantly faster, as combustion duration was reduced by around 30%, in some cases, when comparing to diesel. The DME-powered version of the engine was also found to produce lower carbon monoxide (CO) and unburned hydrocarbon (uHC) emissions. Up to a threefold reduction was measured, depending on engine load. NO<sub>x</sub> emissions worsened, when transitioning to DME, for the medium load case. The low-load EGR sweep showed minimal changes in NO<sub>x</sub> emissions. High-pressure EGR can significantly lower DME NOx emissions to below the diesel baseline levels, depending on engine load and speed, as demonstrated by the results of the 8-mode test runs. Given the extremely low particulate emissions, higher EGR concentrations can be utilised by engines operating on DME. Despite resorting to the use of bespoke equipment in this study, the challenges faced during the engine conversion were deemed manageable with the currently available technology.</div></div>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/2024-01-2700
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combustion and Emissions Comparison between a Diesel and a Dimethyl Ether (DME) Off-Highway Compression Ignition Engine

Daniel Butcher, A. J. M. Spencer, Thomas Elliott, E. J. Long et al.
1 citations
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
0.22
article

Combustion and Emissions Comparison between a Diesel and a Dimethyl Ether (DME) Off-Highway Compression Ignition Engine

Daniel Butcher, A. J. M. Spencer, Thomas Elliott, E. J. Long, John Rutledge, Christos Apostolou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Dimethyl ether (DME) is a promising substitute for diesel as a fuel in heavy-duty engines. This article presents the comparison between a diesel- and a DME-powered compression ignition engine. The diesel-powered version was initially characterised at a range of operating points before being converted to operate on DME. This was achieved by replacing fuel system components with bespoke DME-compatible engine parts. An off-board fuel pressurisation and conditioning system was designed to replace the existing high-pressure fuel pump, while maintaining all other engine hardware and components.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">Engine behaviour, in terms of combustion and emissions on both fuels was examined. Firstly, the effect of varying recirculated exhaust gas (EGR) concentration at constant excess air ratio, combustion phasing (CA50) and equal fuel delivery rate (by energy input) was interrogated. DME combustion was significantly faster, as combustion duration was reduced by around 30%, in some cases, when comparing to diesel. The DME-powered version of the engine was also found to produce lower carbon monoxide (CO) and unburned hydrocarbon (uHC) emissions. Up to a threefold reduction was measured, depending on engine load. NO<sub>x</sub> emissions worsened, when transitioning to DME, for the medium load case. The low-load EGR sweep showed minimal changes in NO<sub>x</sub> emissions. High-pressure EGR can significantly lower DME NOx emissions to below the diesel baseline levels, depending on engine load and speed, as demonstrated by the results of the 8-mode test runs. Given the extremely low particulate emissions, higher EGR concentrations can be utilised by engines operating on DME. Despite resorting to the use of bespoke equipment in this study, the challenges faced during the engine conversion were deemed manageable with the currently available technology.</div></div>

SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesVol. 1
Loughborough University (GB)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
0.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.