Rectal Cancer and Lateral Lymph Node Staging: Interobserver Agreement and Success in Predicting Locoregional Recurrence

<b>Objectives:</b> To evaluate the agreement among radiologists in the evaluation of rectal cancer staging and restaging (after neoadjuvant therapy) and assess whether locoregional recurrence can be predicted with this information. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Pre-neoadjuvant and after-neoadjuvant therapy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations of 239 patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer were retrospectively reviewed by three radiologists. The agreement between the MRI findings (localization of tumor involvement, tumor coverage pattern, external sphincter involvement, mucin content of the mass and lymph node, changes in the peritoneum, MRI T stage, distance between tumor and MRF, submucosal sign, classification of locoregional lymph node, and EMVI) was discussed at the September 2023 meeting of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) and the interobserver and histopathological findings were examined. The patients were evaluated according to locoregional rectal cancer and lateral lymph node (LLN) staging, and re-staging was performed using MRI images after neoadjuvant treatment. The ability of the locoregional and LLN staging system to predict locoregional recurrence was evaluated. <b>Results:</b> Among the parameters examined, for the MRI T stage and distance between the tumor and the MRF, a moderate agreement (kappa values: 0.61-0.80) was obtained, while for all other parameters, the interobserver agreement was notably high (kappa values 0.81-1.00). LLNs during the restaging with an OR of 2.1 (95% CI = 0.33-4.87, <i>p</i> = 0.004) and a distance between the tumor and the MRF of less than 1 mm with an OR of 2.1 (95% CI = 1.12-3.94, <i>p</i> = 0.023) affected locoregional recurrence. A multivariable Cox regression test revealed that the restaging of lymph nodes among the relevant parameters had an impact on locoregional recurrence, with an OR of 1.6 (95% CI = 0.32-1.82, <i>p</i> = 0.047). With the LLN staging system, an increase in stage was observed in 37 patients (15.5%), and locoregional recurrence was detected in 33 of them (89.2%) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> LLN staging is not only successful in predicting locoregional recurrence among MRI parameters but is also associated with a very high level of interobserver agreement. The presence of positive LLN in the restaging phase is one of the most valuable MRI parameters for poor prognosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14222570
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rectal Cancer and Lateral Lymph Node Staging: Interobserver Agreement and Success in Predicting Locoregional Recurrence

Zeynel Abidin Taş, Selim Özdemir, Bozkurt Gülek, Okan Dılek et al.
9 citations
Diagnostics
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
2.54
article

Rectal Cancer and Lateral Lymph Node Staging: Interobserver Agreement and Success in Predicting Locoregional Recurrence

Zeynel Abidin Taş, Selim Özdemir, Bozkurt Gülek, Okan Dılek, Hüseyin Akkaya, Mustafa Gürbüz, Süleyman Çetinkünar, Turgay Öztürkçü
article en
9 citations

Abstract

<b>Objectives:</b> To evaluate the agreement among radiologists in the evaluation of rectal cancer staging and restaging (after neoadjuvant therapy) and assess whether locoregional recurrence can be predicted with this information. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Pre-neoadjuvant and after-neoadjuvant therapy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations of 239 patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer were retrospectively reviewed by three radiologists. The agreement between the MRI findings (localization of tumor involvement, tumor coverage pattern, external sphincter involvement, mucin content of the mass and lymph node, changes in the peritoneum, MRI T stage, distance between tumor and MRF, submucosal sign, classification of locoregional lymph node, and EMVI) was discussed at the September 2023 meeting of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) and the interobserver and histopathological findings were examined. The patients were evaluated according to locoregional rectal cancer and lateral lymph node (LLN) staging, and re-staging was performed using MRI images after neoadjuvant treatment. The ability of the locoregional and LLN staging system to predict locoregional recurrence was evaluated. <b>Results:</b> Among the parameters examined, for the MRI T stage and distance between the tumor and the MRF, a moderate agreement (kappa values: 0.61-0.80) was obtained, while for all other parameters, the interobserver agreement was notably high (kappa values 0.81-1.00). LLNs during the restaging with an OR of 2.1 (95% CI = 0.33-4.87, <i>p</i> = 0.004) and a distance between the tumor and the MRF of less than 1 mm with an OR of 2.1 (95% CI = 1.12-3.94, <i>p</i> = 0.023) affected locoregional recurrence. A multivariable Cox regression test revealed that the restaging of lymph nodes among the relevant parameters had an impact on locoregional recurrence, with an OR of 1.6 (95% CI = 0.32-1.82, <i>p</i> = 0.047). With the LLN staging system, an increase in stage was observed in 37 patients (15.5%), and locoregional recurrence was detected in 33 of them (89.2%) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> LLN staging is not only successful in predicting locoregional recurrence among MRI parameters but is also associated with a very high level of interobserver agreement. The presence of positive LLN in the restaging phase is one of the most valuable MRI parameters for poor prognosis.

DiagnosticsVol. 14(22)
Ondokuz Mayıs University (TR), Sivas State Hospital (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
2.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.