Influence of Badminton Coaches on the Athletes’ Self-Efficacy

This study employed a correlational research method to examine the relationship between coaches’ self-efficacy – specifically in terms of emotion, optimism, work satisfaction and self-confidence -and athletes’ self-efficacy, which includes personality self- efficacy, sports discipline, psychological self-efficacy and professional thought efficacy. A purposive sampling technique was used to specifically select 10 badminton coaches. Meanwhile, stratified sampling was employed to proportionately distribute the 300 athletes from five universities, ensuring representation from different subgroups. This study found no significant correlation between coaches’ self-efficacy and athletes’ self-efficacy as indicated by the p values greatre than the .05 level of significance set in the study. Despite the Spearman rho coefficients ranging from moderate to high, these results were not statistically significant, these findings suggest that while there may be observable trends the relationship between coaches and athletes’ self-efficacy is not conclusively supported by the data.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijmee.v3n3.12
Primary Topic
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of Badminton Coaches on the Athletes’ Self-Efficacy

MARIA LIRIA D. DACANAY, Xiaojiang Zhao
International Journal of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
article

Influence of Badminton Coaches on the Athletes’ Self-Efficacy

MARIA LIRIA D. DACANAY, Xiaojiang Zhao
article en

Abstract

This study employed a correlational research method to examine the relationship between coaches’ self-efficacy – specifically in terms of emotion, optimism, work satisfaction and self-confidence -and athletes’ self-efficacy, which includes personality self- efficacy, sports discipline, psychological self-efficacy and professional thought efficacy. A purposive sampling technique was used to specifically select 10 badminton coaches. Meanwhile, stratified sampling was employed to proportionately distribute the 300 athletes from five universities, ensuring representation from different subgroups. This study found no significant correlation between coaches’ self-efficacy and athletes’ self-efficacy as indicated by the p values greatre than the .05 level of significance set in the study. Despite the Spearman rho coefficients ranging from moderate to high, these results were not statistically significant, these findings suggest that while there may be observable trends the relationship between coaches and athletes’ self-efficacy is not conclusively supported by the data.

International Journal of Mechanical and Electrical EngineeringVol. 3(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Influence of Badminton Coaches on the Athletes’ Self-Efficacy — MARIA LIRIA D. DACANAY, Xiaojiang Zhao · International Journal of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS