Comparison of Contrast Sensitivity between Alternating and Monocular Intermittent Exotropia

Purpose: To determine if contrast sensitivity varies between alternating and monocular intermittent exotropia.Methods: The study conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records for children aged 5-9 years with intermittent exotropia who had uncorrected visual acuity of 1.0 or better, a spherical equivalent of ± 1.50 diopters (D) or less, and anisometropia of 1.00 D or less. Patients were categorized into two groups using the cover-uncover test: an alternating group without fixation preference and a monocular group with fixation preference. Contrast sensitivity tests were performed on each eye under mesopic and photopic conditions with glare. In the alternating group, eyes were classified as right or left while in the monocular group the non-deviated eye was labeled dominant and the deviated eye was non-dominant.Results: The study included 53 patients with 31 in the alternating group and 22 in the monocular group. In the alternating exotropia group, the left eye demonstrated significantly better contrast sensitivity at 1.1 cycles per degree (cpd) under mesopic conditions (<i>p</i> = 0.043), with no significant differences noted under other conditions. In the monocular exotropia group, dominant eyes exhibited significantly better contrast sensitivity at 10.2 cpd under mesopic conditions (<i>p</i> = 0.046) and at 1.1 cpd under photopic conditions (<i>p</i> = 0.031). No significant differences were observed in the interocular contrast sensitivity between the monocular and alternating groups across all spatial frequencies under both mesopic and photopic conditions.Conclusions: Pediatric patients with monocular intermittent exotropia displayed no significant differences in contrast sensitivity between dominant and non-dominant eyes except at certain frequencies. Additionally, there were no significant interocular contrast sensitivity differences between the monocular and alternating groups suggesting that contrast sensitivity tests may not be effective for determining the dominant eye in these conditions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2024.65.11.731
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Contrast Sensitivity between Alternating and Monocular Intermittent Exotropia

Soo Jung Lee, Hyun Jung Kim
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society
Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders
article

Comparison of Contrast Sensitivity between Alternating and Monocular Intermittent Exotropia

Soo Jung Lee, Hyun Jung Kim
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To determine if contrast sensitivity varies between alternating and monocular intermittent exotropia.Methods: The study conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records for children aged 5-9 years with intermittent exotropia who had uncorrected visual acuity of 1.0 or better, a spherical equivalent of ± 1.50 diopters (D) or less, and anisometropia of 1.00 D or less. Patients were categorized into two groups using the cover-uncover test: an alternating group without fixation preference and a monocular group with fixation preference. Contrast sensitivity tests were performed on each eye under mesopic and photopic conditions with glare. In the alternating group, eyes were classified as right or left while in the monocular group the non-deviated eye was labeled dominant and the deviated eye was non-dominant.Results: The study included 53 patients with 31 in the alternating group and 22 in the monocular group. In the alternating exotropia group, the left eye demonstrated significantly better contrast sensitivity at 1.1 cycles per degree (cpd) under mesopic conditions (<i>p</i> = 0.043), with no significant differences noted under other conditions. In the monocular exotropia group, dominant eyes exhibited significantly better contrast sensitivity at 10.2 cpd under mesopic conditions (<i>p</i> = 0.046) and at 1.1 cpd under photopic conditions (<i>p</i> = 0.031). No significant differences were observed in the interocular contrast sensitivity between the monocular and alternating groups across all spatial frequencies under both mesopic and photopic conditions.Conclusions: Pediatric patients with monocular intermittent exotropia displayed no significant differences in contrast sensitivity between dominant and non-dominant eyes except at certain frequencies. Additionally, there were no significant interocular contrast sensitivity differences between the monocular and alternating groups suggesting that contrast sensitivity tests may not be effective for determining the dominant eye in these conditions.

Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological SocietyVol. 65(11)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Contrast Sensitivity between Alternating and Monocular Intermittent Exotropia — Soo Jung Lee, Hyun Jung Kim · Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS