The challenge of measuring innovation types: A systematic literature review

Measuring innovation has long posed a significant challenge and has been the subject of extensive scientific research. Various definitions and measures of innovation exist, and each measurement approach faces limitations. This research aims to conduct a systematic literature review to expose the tendencies in measuring various types of innovation, thereby revealing different approaches, challenges, and limitations. This paper systemises and groups indicators, highlighting similarities and differences in measuring various innovation types. The systematic literature review includes 172 papers from the WoS Core Collection and Scopus databases, presenting innovation indicators across nine types of innovation: product, process, service, technological, management (or organizational, administrative), business model, supply chain, green (or environmental, eco), and open innovation. The analysis reveals that researchers often employ a broad range of indicators, many of which are not even closely aligned with specific innovation types. Accordingly, this paper offers recommendations for selecting indicators tailored to innovation type.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100620
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The challenge of measuring innovation types: A systematic literature review

Andrius Grybauskas, Alina Stundžienė, Mantas Lukauskas, Vaida Pilinkienė et al.
17 citations
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge
Innovation and Knowledge Management
9.43
article

The challenge of measuring innovation types: A systematic literature review

Andrius Grybauskas, Alina Stundžienė, Mantas Lukauskas, Vaida Pilinkienė, Mantas Vilkas
article en
17 citations

Abstract

Measuring innovation has long posed a significant challenge and has been the subject of extensive scientific research. Various definitions and measures of innovation exist, and each measurement approach faces limitations. This research aims to conduct a systematic literature review to expose the tendencies in measuring various types of innovation, thereby revealing different approaches, challenges, and limitations. This paper systemises and groups indicators, highlighting similarities and differences in measuring various innovation types. The systematic literature review includes 172 papers from the WoS Core Collection and Scopus databases, presenting innovation indicators across nine types of innovation: product, process, service, technological, management (or organizational, administrative), business model, supply chain, green (or environmental, eco), and open innovation. The analysis reveals that researchers often employ a broad range of indicators, many of which are not even closely aligned with specific innovation types. Accordingly, this paper offers recommendations for selecting indicators tailored to innovation type.

Journal of Innovation & KnowledgeVol. 9(4)
Kaunas University of Technology (LT)
Lietuvos Mokslo Taryba
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
9.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The challenge of measuring innovation types: A systematic literature review — Andrius Grybauskas, Alina Stundžienė, et al. · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS