Comparison of the Effectiveness of Risk Models Used in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia

Newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) patients were evaluated, and the effectiveness of the Sanz risk model was compared with other risk models developed for early mortality. To determine a simple, reliable, and highly effective risk model used in clinical practice for earlier recognition of high-risk patients at high risk of mortality. This is a retrospective analysis of 57 patients diagnosed with APL in our clinic between January 2002 and June 2019. Patients were grouped under the risk models of Sanz score, modified Sanz risk score, the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), and other scores by Österroos et al. and Cai et al. We found higher white blood count (WBC) is independently associated with 30-day mortality [Odds ratio (OR): 1.030, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.005 - 1.055, p= 0.017]. Albumin, another variable included in the multivariable model, was found non-significant (p= 0.055). The modified Sanz risk score had a sensitivity of 77.78% and specificity of 66.67% to predict 30-day mortality for high and ultra-high-risk patients [Area under the curve (AUC): 0.727, 95% CI: 0.514 - 0.939, p= 0.032]. Additionally, the AUC of the modified Sanz risk score was significantly higher than the Sanz risk score (p= 0.028). We found no significant difference between the AUC of the Sanz risk score and Österroos et al.’s, Cai et al.’s, and ISTH risk scores. Timely recognition of high-risk patients, taking appropriate protective measures, and administering more aggressive supportive care can help reduce the early mortality of APL patients. Sanz risk score and other scoring systems have been guiding the identification of high-risk APL patients. However, the most effective scoring system could not be determined at the end of the study. There is still a need for standardized scoring systems to identify high-risk patients more effectively, including comorbidities. Keywords: Acute promyelocytic leukemia, Early mortality, Modified Sanz risk score, Risk scores

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Hematology and Oncology
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4999/uhod.247566
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Risk Models Used in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia

Vildan Gürsoy
1 citations
International Journal of Hematology and Oncology
Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
0.23
article

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Risk Models Used in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia

Vildan Gürsoy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) patients were evaluated, and the effectiveness of the Sanz risk model was compared with other risk models developed for early mortality. To determine a simple, reliable, and highly effective risk model used in clinical practice for earlier recognition of high-risk patients at high risk of mortality. This is a retrospective analysis of 57 patients diagnosed with APL in our clinic between January 2002 and June 2019. Patients were grouped under the risk models of Sanz score, modified Sanz risk score, the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), and other scores by Österroos et al. and Cai et al. We found higher white blood count (WBC) is independently associated with 30-day mortality [Odds ratio (OR): 1.030, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.005 - 1.055, p= 0.017]. Albumin, another variable included in the multivariable model, was found non-significant (p= 0.055). The modified Sanz risk score had a sensitivity of 77.78% and specificity of 66.67% to predict 30-day mortality for high and ultra-high-risk patients [Area under the curve (AUC): 0.727, 95% CI: 0.514 - 0.939, p= 0.032]. Additionally, the AUC of the modified Sanz risk score was significantly higher than the Sanz risk score (p= 0.028). We found no significant difference between the AUC of the Sanz risk score and Österroos et al.’s, Cai et al.’s, and ISTH risk scores. Timely recognition of high-risk patients, taking appropriate protective measures, and administering more aggressive supportive care can help reduce the early mortality of APL patients. Sanz risk score and other scoring systems have been guiding the identification of high-risk APL patients. However, the most effective scoring system could not be determined at the end of the study. There is still a need for standardized scoring systems to identify high-risk patients more effectively, including comorbidities. Keywords: Acute promyelocytic leukemia, Early mortality, Modified Sanz risk score, Risk scores

International Journal of Hematology and OncologyVol. 34(3)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
0.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.