Survey on Cardiologists’ Perspectives on Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasounds (POCUS)

<b>Introduction</b>: Cardiac point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has been used with increasing frequency. As a result of this trend, this study sought to characterize cardiologists' perspectives on cardiac POCUS. <b>Methods:</b> An 18-question survey on demographics, cardiac POCUS clinical practice, education, and infrastructure was distributed by 16 academic medical centers. Likert scale responses were categorized into three groups: 1) "strongly agree" or "agree" 2) "strongly disagree" and "disagree" and 3) "neutral." <b>Results:</b> Of the 140 survey responses collected from January to September 2021, 41% of respondents used cardiac POCUS more than twice in an inpatient week. Seventy-one percent of cardiologists believed that cardiac POCUS should be integrated more regularly into clinical practice and into cardiology fellowship education. Less than half of respondents (44%) reported easy access to POCUS devices, and more than half of respondents (56%) did not think there was appropriate institutional infrastructure to easily upload and document cardiac POCUS images (56%). <b>Conclusions</b>: Academic cardiologists had varying opinions on the use and impact of cardiac POCUS. However, most cardiologists believed that cardiac POCUS should be more incorporated within practice despite persisting infrastructure barriers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
POCUS Journal
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24908/pocus.v9i2.17258
Primary Topic
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Survey on Cardiologists’ Perspectives on Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasounds (POCUS)

Cooper B. Kersey, Christine Chow, Andrew M. Pattock, Kavita Khaira et al.
POCUS Journal
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
article

Survey on Cardiologists’ Perspectives on Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasounds (POCUS)

Cooper B. Kersey, Christine Chow, Andrew M. Pattock, Kavita Khaira, Yoon-Sik Cho, Linda Liu, Younghoon Kwon, Sula Mazimba, Brandon M. Wiley, Jonathan Lindner, Carlos L. Alviar, James N. Kirkpatrick
article en

Abstract

<b>Introduction</b>: Cardiac point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has been used with increasing frequency. As a result of this trend, this study sought to characterize cardiologists' perspectives on cardiac POCUS. <b>Methods:</b> An 18-question survey on demographics, cardiac POCUS clinical practice, education, and infrastructure was distributed by 16 academic medical centers. Likert scale responses were categorized into three groups: 1) "strongly agree" or "agree" 2) "strongly disagree" and "disagree" and 3) "neutral." <b>Results:</b> Of the 140 survey responses collected from January to September 2021, 41% of respondents used cardiac POCUS more than twice in an inpatient week. Seventy-one percent of cardiologists believed that cardiac POCUS should be integrated more regularly into clinical practice and into cardiology fellowship education. Less than half of respondents (44%) reported easy access to POCUS devices, and more than half of respondents (56%) did not think there was appropriate institutional infrastructure to easily upload and document cardiac POCUS images (56%). <b>Conclusions</b>: Academic cardiologists had varying opinions on the use and impact of cardiac POCUS. However, most cardiologists believed that cardiac POCUS should be more incorporated within practice despite persisting infrastructure barriers.

POCUS JournalVol. 9(2)
University of Southern California (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US), University of Washington (US), University of Chicago (US), NYU Langone Health (US), VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US), Los Angeles Medical Center (US), University of Virginia Medical Center (US), Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada) (CA), New York University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.