Reconstruction of the Position and Authority of the Honorary Council of General Election Organizers (DKPP) as a QuasiEthical Court of Election Organizers

The Honorary Council of Election Organizers (DKPP) is an institution responsible for resolving ethical violations committed by election organizers, established under the law as part of Indonesia’s election system. As a state institution, the DKPP holds the authority to examine, summon, sanction, and adjudicate such violations through a court-like process, which includes witness examination, expert testimony, verification of evidence, and the issuance of rulings. Notably, DKPP decisions are final and materially binding. The quasi-judicial nature of its proceedings, combined with the finality of its decisions, places the DKPP in a unique legal position, often referred to as a "quasi-public court." In the Constitutional Court's interpretation, the DKPP functions as an integral part of the election administration alongside the General Election Commission (KPU) and the Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu), forming a comprehensive election organizing body. This study explores the legal status and authority of the DKPP, particularly in its role as a quasi-public court. Through normative legal research with a descriptive and prescriptive approach, using legislative, conceptual, historical, and comparative methods, the study concludes that the DKPP, as an independent auxiliary state organ, functions similarly to a general court in enforcing the code of ethics for election organizers. The final and binding nature of its decisions has significant legal implications, reinforcing the DKPP's role in maintaining electoral integrity within Indonesia’s constitutional framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Law and Regulation Governance
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57185/jlarg.v2i9.67
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconstruction of the Position and Authority of the Honorary Council of General Election Organizers (DKPP) as a QuasiEthical Court of Election Organizers

Sukamto Satoto, A Zarkasi, Wein Arifin
Journal of Law and Regulation Governance
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Reconstruction of the Position and Authority of the Honorary Council of General Election Organizers (DKPP) as a QuasiEthical Court of Election Organizers

Sukamto Satoto, A Zarkasi, Wein Arifin
article en

Abstract

The Honorary Council of Election Organizers (DKPP) is an institution responsible for resolving ethical violations committed by election organizers, established under the law as part of Indonesia’s election system. As a state institution, the DKPP holds the authority to examine, summon, sanction, and adjudicate such violations through a court-like process, which includes witness examination, expert testimony, verification of evidence, and the issuance of rulings. Notably, DKPP decisions are final and materially binding. The quasi-judicial nature of its proceedings, combined with the finality of its decisions, places the DKPP in a unique legal position, often referred to as a "quasi-public court." In the Constitutional Court's interpretation, the DKPP functions as an integral part of the election administration alongside the General Election Commission (KPU) and the Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu), forming a comprehensive election organizing body. This study explores the legal status and authority of the DKPP, particularly in its role as a quasi-public court. Through normative legal research with a descriptive and prescriptive approach, using legislative, conceptual, historical, and comparative methods, the study concludes that the DKPP, as an independent auxiliary state organ, functions similarly to a general court in enforcing the code of ethics for election organizers. The final and binding nature of its decisions has significant legal implications, reinforcing the DKPP's role in maintaining electoral integrity within Indonesia’s constitutional framework.

Journal of Law and Regulation GovernanceVol. 2(9)
Universitas Jambi (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.