Application Of Criminal Sanctions Law Against Debt Collectors Who Withdraw Fiduciary Guarantee Objects

This study examines the application of criminal sanctions to debt collectors involved in withdrawing fiduciary guarantee objects, focusing on their actions in executing such guarantees under Financial Services Authority Regulation No. 35 of 2018. Employing empirical legal research and field data, the study identifies that debt collectors who use excessive methods in seizing fiduciary objects may be liable for criminal acts, particularly under Article 368(1) of the Criminal Code, which covers extortion. The novelty of this research lies in its detailed analysis of the legal implications surrounding debt collector behaviour during fiduciary executions. The findings clarify the legal boundaries and potential sanctions for violations, underscoring the need for stricter enforcement of laws governing debt collection practices. The study recommends stronger legal oversight and the implementation of clearer regulations to ensure debt collectors act within legal and ethical boundaries. Furthermore, the research calls for enhanced public awareness of legal protections for debtors and more rigorous oversight to prevent abusive debt collection practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JURNAL LEGALITAS
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v17i2.20295
Primary Topic
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application Of Criminal Sanctions Law Against Debt Collectors Who Withdraw Fiduciary Guarantee Objects

Rafika Nur, Zainab Abbas, Sumiyati Sumiyati, Rongki Ali Gobel
JURNAL LEGALITAS
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
article

Application Of Criminal Sanctions Law Against Debt Collectors Who Withdraw Fiduciary Guarantee Objects

Rafika Nur, Zainab Abbas, Sumiyati Sumiyati, Rongki Ali Gobel
article en

Abstract

This study examines the application of criminal sanctions to debt collectors involved in withdrawing fiduciary guarantee objects, focusing on their actions in executing such guarantees under Financial Services Authority Regulation No. 35 of 2018. Employing empirical legal research and field data, the study identifies that debt collectors who use excessive methods in seizing fiduciary objects may be liable for criminal acts, particularly under Article 368(1) of the Criminal Code, which covers extortion. The novelty of this research lies in its detailed analysis of the legal implications surrounding debt collector behaviour during fiduciary executions. The findings clarify the legal boundaries and potential sanctions for violations, underscoring the need for stricter enforcement of laws governing debt collection practices. The study recommends stronger legal oversight and the implementation of clearer regulations to ensure debt collectors act within legal and ethical boundaries. Furthermore, the research calls for enhanced public awareness of legal protections for debtors and more rigorous oversight to prevent abusive debt collection practices.

JURNAL LEGALITASVol. 17(2)
Universitas Ichsan Gorontalo (ID), Universiti Teknologi MARA System (MY), Universiti Teknologi MARA (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Application Of Criminal Sanctions Law Against Debt Collectors Who Withdraw Fiduciary Guarantee Objects — Rafika Nur, Zainab Abbas, et al. · JURNAL LEGALITAS (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS