Analyzing the Impact of Multiple Foundation Stiffness Correlation on the Natural Frequency of Offshore wind turbines

The analysis of wind turbine behavior should avoid unplanned resonance, as it can increase fatigue damage. It is essential to rigorously evaluate the natural frequency of wind turbines in the initial design stage. This estimation can be done through two steps, the first one is the computing of the fixed base natural frequency of the wind turbine. The second is the estimation of the foundation stiffness effect. This paper examines the error margin of four correlations of foundation stiffness namely Randolph, Davies and Budhu, DNV, and Higgins in the estimation of the natural frequency of wind turbines. The fixed base natural frequency was estimated in this paper using a special-purpose finite element computer program called TurbiSoft through beam and volume elements. A reference 5.0 MW offshore wind turbine and 9 other turbines from different wind farms have been analyzed. For the fixed base natural frequency, obtained results demonstrate the reliability of the finite element program TurbiSoft through an error margin between 1-4% for the reference 5.0 MW offshore wind turbine. For the natural frequency of the whole system, the estimated error marking was between 9-20% which is an important value.This significant error is attributed to the low accuracy of these four correlation formulas for predicting the foundation flexibility contribution. The results from the four correlation formulas used are quite similar, with a difference in the error margin of less than 1%. However, the largest error margins are observed with the Higgins formula, which has been originally developed for short monopiles, even though the analyzed monopiles can be considered short, with monopile slenderness ratios less than 8.