[The value of differential diagnosis of post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index between esophageal diseases of gut-brain interaction and gastroesophageal reflux disease].

<b>Objective:</b> To analyze the value of differential diagnosis of post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index (PSPWI) between esophageal diseases of gut-brain interaction (E-DGBI) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). <b>Methods:</b> The patients diagnosed as E-DGBI and GERD in the Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Tsinghua Changguang Hospital from June 2016 to June 2018 were retrospectively included. The medical records, gastroscopy and 24-hour pH-intraluminal impedance monitoring reports were collected. According to clinical diagnosis, the patients were divided into E-DGBI group and GERD group. PSPWI, acid exposure time (AET), DeMeester score, total reflux times and mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) were compared between the both group. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of PSPWI, AET, total reflux times and MNBI was drawn to identify the sensitivity and specificity of E-DGBI and GERD. The cut-off values were calculated with Youden index and the area under the curve (AUC) was compared. <b>Results:</b> A total of 73 patients were included,including 36 males and 37 females, whose age [<i>M (Q</i><sub>1</sub><i>, Q</i><sub>3</sub>)] was 54.0 (42.6, 63.0) years. There were 39 cases in E-DGBI group and 34 cases in GERD group. The 24-h AET [0.5 (0.1, 1.6) vs 6.0 (3.6, 11.9)], DeMeester score [2.8 (1.1, 5.7) vs 20.4 (14.7, 47.4) score] and total reflux times [32.0 (19.0, 53.0) vs 66.0 (34.3, 96.0) times] were significantly higher in E-DGBI group than those in GERD group (all <i>P</i><0.001);MNBI in E-DGBI group was higher than that in GERD group[2 375.0 (1 726.0, 2 978.0)Ω vs 1 361.0 (814.0, 2 273.5)Ω, <i>P</i><0.001]. The PSPWI in E-DGBI group is higher than that in GERD (0.56±0.19 vs 0.25±0.15, <i>P</i><0.001). According to ROC, with PSPWI>0.46 as the cut-off value, the AUC was 0.895 (95%<i>CI</i>: 0.827-0.963) in differentiating E-DGBI and GERD. The sensitivity was 94.1% and the specificity was 69.2%. There were no significant differences of AUC between PSPWI and AET or total reflux events (all <i>P</i>>0.05). But the AUC of PSPWI was higher than that of MNBI (AUC=0.749,95%<i>CI</i>:0.632-0.866,<i>P</i>=0.031). <b>Conclusion:</b> PSPWI can better distinguish E-DGBI from GERD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240410-00836
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

[The value of differential diagnosis of post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index between esophageal diseases of gut-brain interaction and gastroesophageal reflux disease].

R F Wang, Xiaobo Yu, Xueru Huo, Xiaojun Guo et al.
PubMed
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

[The value of differential diagnosis of post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index between esophageal diseases of gut-brain interaction and gastroesophageal reflux disease].

R F Wang, Xiaobo Yu, Xueru Huo, Xiaojun Guo, Yingxue Ren, Xiaofang Ying
article en

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> To analyze the value of differential diagnosis of post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index (PSPWI) between esophageal diseases of gut-brain interaction (E-DGBI) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). <b>Methods:</b> The patients diagnosed as E-DGBI and GERD in the Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Tsinghua Changguang Hospital from June 2016 to June 2018 were retrospectively included. The medical records, gastroscopy and 24-hour pH-intraluminal impedance monitoring reports were collected. According to clinical diagnosis, the patients were divided into E-DGBI group and GERD group. PSPWI, acid exposure time (AET), DeMeester score, total reflux times and mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) were compared between the both group. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of PSPWI, AET, total reflux times and MNBI was drawn to identify the sensitivity and specificity of E-DGBI and GERD. The cut-off values were calculated with Youden index and the area under the curve (AUC) was compared. <b>Results:</b> A total of 73 patients were included,including 36 males and 37 females, whose age [<i>M (Q</i><sub>1</sub><i>, Q</i><sub>3</sub>)] was 54.0 (42.6, 63.0) years. There were 39 cases in E-DGBI group and 34 cases in GERD group. The 24-h AET [0.5 (0.1, 1.6) vs 6.0 (3.6, 11.9)], DeMeester score [2.8 (1.1, 5.7) vs 20.4 (14.7, 47.4) score] and total reflux times [32.0 (19.0, 53.0) vs 66.0 (34.3, 96.0) times] were significantly higher in E-DGBI group than those in GERD group (all <i>P</i><0.001);MNBI in E-DGBI group was higher than that in GERD group[2 375.0 (1 726.0, 2 978.0)Ω vs 1 361.0 (814.0, 2 273.5)Ω, <i>P</i><0.001]. The PSPWI in E-DGBI group is higher than that in GERD (0.56±0.19 vs 0.25±0.15, <i>P</i><0.001). According to ROC, with PSPWI>0.46 as the cut-off value, the AUC was 0.895 (95%<i>CI</i>: 0.827-0.963) in differentiating E-DGBI and GERD. The sensitivity was 94.1% and the specificity was 69.2%. There were no significant differences of AUC between PSPWI and AET or total reflux events (all <i>P</i>>0.05). But the AUC of PSPWI was higher than that of MNBI (AUC=0.749,95%<i>CI</i>:0.632-0.866,<i>P</i>=0.031). <b>Conclusion:</b> PSPWI can better distinguish E-DGBI from GERD.

PubMedVol. 104(43)
Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital (CN)
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.