War, diplomacy, and more war: why did the Minsk agreements fail?

Despite significant Western involvement, most notably by the leaders of Germany, France, and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), the diplomatic efforts in 2014 and 2015 to forge a functioning and lasting ceasefire in Donbas ended up as a failure. The ceasefire agreements signed in September 2014 and February 2015, commonly known as ‘Minsk I’ and ‘Minsk II’, remained largely unimplemented throughout the following years, much to the frustration of the agreements’ Western backers. On February 24, 2022, Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine. This article examines the underlying causes that ultimately led to the demise of the Minsk process. Drawing on theoretical insights from the negotiation studies literature, the article seeks to shed light on the diplomatic processes that preceded the signing of the agreements, as well as the practical difficulties that the parties were facing, and created for each other, in the implementation phase.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Politics
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-024-00637-x
Citations
2
Primary Topic
European Politics and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

War, diplomacy, and more war: why did the Minsk agreements fail?

Kristian Åtland
2 citations
International Politics
European Politics and Security
4.46
article

War, diplomacy, and more war: why did the Minsk agreements fail?

Kristian Åtland
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Despite significant Western involvement, most notably by the leaders of Germany, France, and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), the diplomatic efforts in 2014 and 2015 to forge a functioning and lasting ceasefire in Donbas ended up as a failure. The ceasefire agreements signed in September 2014 and February 2015, commonly known as ‘Minsk I’ and ‘Minsk II’, remained largely unimplemented throughout the following years, much to the frustration of the agreements’ Western backers. On February 24, 2022, Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine. This article examines the underlying causes that ultimately led to the demise of the Minsk process. Drawing on theoretical insights from the negotiation studies literature, the article seeks to shed light on the diplomatic processes that preceded the signing of the agreements, as well as the practical difficulties that the parties were facing, and created for each other, in the implementation phase.

International Politics
Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (NO), Nord University (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
European Politics and Security
4.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

War, diplomacy, and more war: why did the Minsk agreements fail? — Kristian Åtland · International Politics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS