GLOBAL HEALTH PREPAREDNESS: ANALYZING RESPONSES TO EPIDEMICS AND PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCIES

This study examines global health preparedness by analyzing quantitative data on preparedness indicators and qualitative insights from expert interviews across 30 countries. Using data from the WHO, Global Health Security Index (GHSI), and International Health Regulations (IHR) assessments, countries were categorized by preparedness levels: high (GHSI > 75), moderate (50–75), and low (< 50). Countries with strong healthcare infrastructure and surveillance systems, such as the United States, Germany, and Japan, showed significantly lower-case fatality rates (correlation coefficient -0.65, p < 0.05) and faster containment times compared to nations with less robust systems, like India, Nigeria, and Ethiopia. Thematic analysis of 120 expert interviews revealed key themes, including resource allocation challenges, public trust, and international collaboration. Countries with centralized decision-making structures notably demonstrated faster responses, while those with high public trust saw better compliance with health measures. Despite the essential role of international cooperation, geopolitical tensions often limit effective cross-border responses. This study underscores the importance of strengthening health infrastructure, fostering public trust, and enhancing global partnerships to mitigate future health crises.

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53555/0d2dmq48
Primary Topic
Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GLOBAL HEALTH PREPAREDNESS: ANALYZING RESPONSES TO EPIDEMICS AND PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCIES

Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
article

GLOBAL HEALTH PREPAREDNESS: ANALYZING RESPONSES TO EPIDEMICS AND PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCIES

article en

Abstract

This study examines global health preparedness by analyzing quantitative data on preparedness indicators and qualitative insights from expert interviews across 30 countries. Using data from the WHO, Global Health Security Index (GHSI), and International Health Regulations (IHR) assessments, countries were categorized by preparedness levels: high (GHSI > 75), moderate (50–75), and low (< 50). Countries with strong healthcare infrastructure and surveillance systems, such as the United States, Germany, and Japan, showed significantly lower-case fatality rates (correlation coefficient -0.65, p < 0.05) and faster containment times compared to nations with less robust systems, like India, Nigeria, and Ethiopia. Thematic analysis of 120 expert interviews revealed key themes, including resource allocation challenges, public trust, and international collaboration. Countries with centralized decision-making structures notably demonstrated faster responses, while those with high public trust saw better compliance with health measures. Despite the essential role of international cooperation, geopolitical tensions often limit effective cross-border responses. This study underscores the importance of strengthening health infrastructure, fostering public trust, and enhancing global partnerships to mitigate future health crises.

Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.