Analysis of Affective Domain Trends in Mathematics Education Using Dynamic Topic Modeling

This study analyzes trends in affective domain research through dynamic topic modeling, examining 380 papers published in seven major Korean mathematics education journals. The number of topics was set at nine based on coherence and perplexity measures, and topics were identified by considering the frequency and relevance of keywords. Topic 1 was disposition, attitude, interest, achievement, and pedagogy, Topic 2 was anxiety, interest, belief, factors, and levels, Topic 3 was attitude, problem solving, and programs, Topic 4 was attitude, belief, abilities, and learning activities, Topic 5 was belief, motivation, anxiety, programs, and activities, Topic 6 was affect(meta-affect), attitude, levels, and achievement, Topic 7 was self-efficacy, attitude, mathematical models, and practices, Topic 8 was value, motivation, instruction, and achievement, and Topic 9 was anxiety, motivation, textbooks, and storytelling. The topics covered various themes such as attitudes, anxiety, beliefs, motivation, and achievement, reflecting a strong connection to cognitive aspects like achievement, ability, and problem-solving. While overall patterns were similar, topics related to anxiety and beliefs (Topics 2 and 5) showed a distinct upward trend. The emergence of new terms such as ‘meta-affect’ and ‘mindset’ indicates the expanding scope of affective domain research. These findings suggest the need for continued exploration of new areas within the affective domain, alongside its links to cognitive factors, to support students' affective achievements.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57090/sm.2024.09.26.3.445
Primary Topic
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Affective Domain Trends in Mathematics Education Using Dynamic Topic Modeling

Leena Kim, Misun Kwon
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
article

Analysis of Affective Domain Trends in Mathematics Education Using Dynamic Topic Modeling

Leena Kim, Misun Kwon
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes trends in affective domain research through dynamic topic modeling, examining 380 papers published in seven major Korean mathematics education journals. The number of topics was set at nine based on coherence and perplexity measures, and topics were identified by considering the frequency and relevance of keywords. Topic 1 was disposition, attitude, interest, achievement, and pedagogy, Topic 2 was anxiety, interest, belief, factors, and levels, Topic 3 was attitude, problem solving, and programs, Topic 4 was attitude, belief, abilities, and learning activities, Topic 5 was belief, motivation, anxiety, programs, and activities, Topic 6 was affect(meta-affect), attitude, levels, and achievement, Topic 7 was self-efficacy, attitude, mathematical models, and practices, Topic 8 was value, motivation, instruction, and achievement, and Topic 9 was anxiety, motivation, textbooks, and storytelling. The topics covered various themes such as attitudes, anxiety, beliefs, motivation, and achievement, reflecting a strong connection to cognitive aspects like achievement, ability, and problem-solving. While overall patterns were similar, topics related to anxiety and beliefs (Topics 2 and 5) showed a distinct upward trend. The emergence of new terms such as ‘meta-affect’ and ‘mindset’ indicates the expanding scope of affective domain research. These findings suggest the need for continued exploration of new areas within the affective domain, alongside its links to cognitive factors, to support students' affective achievements.

Vol. 26(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.