Metagenomics analysis of bacterial community structure from wood- and soil-feeding termites: metabolic pathways and functional structures toward the degradation of lignocellulose and recalcitrant compounds

Some essential information on gut bacterial profiles and their unique contributions to food digestion in wood-feeding termites (WFT) and soil-feeding termites (SFT) is still inadequate. The feeding type of termites is hypothesized to influence their gut bacterial composition and its functionality in degrading lignocellulose or other organic chemicals. This could potentially provide alternative approaches for the degradation of some recalcitrant environmental chemicals. Therefore, metagenomic analysis can be employed to examine the composition and functional profiles of gut bacterial symbionts in WFT and SFT. Based on the metagenomic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequences of gut bacterial symbionts in the WFT, <i>Microcerotermes</i> sp., and the SFT, <i>Pericapritermes nitobei</i>, the findings revealed a total of 26 major bacterial phyla, with 18 phyla commonly represented in both termites, albeit in varying abundances. Spirochaetes dominated the bacterial symbionts in <i>Microcerotermes</i> sp. at 55%, followed by Fibrobacters, while Firmicutes dominated the gut bacteria symbionts in <i>P. nitobei</i> at 95%, with Actinobacteria coming in second at 2%. Furthermore, the Shannon and phylogenetic tree diversity indices, as well as the observed operational taxonomic units and Chao 1 richness indices, were all found to be higher in the WFT than in the SFT deduced from the alpha diversity analysis. Based on the principal coordinate analysis, exhibited a significant distance dissimilarity between the gut bacterial symbionts. The results showed that the gut bacterial composition differed significantly between the WFT and SFT. Furthermore, Tax4Fun analysis evaluated bacterial functions, revealing the predominance of carbohydrate metabolism, followed by amino acid metabolism and energy metabolism in both <i>Microcerotermes</i> sp. and <i>P. nitobei</i> termites. The results implicated that bacterial symbionts inhabiting the guts of both termites were actively involved in the degradation of lignocellulose and other recalcitrant compounds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Microbiology
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1424982
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metagenomics analysis of bacterial community structure from wood- and soil-feeding termites: metabolic pathways and functional structures toward the degradation of lignocellulose and recalcitrant compounds

Jianzhong Sun, Michael Schagerl, Rania Al-Tohamy, Blessing Danso et al.
5 citations
Frontiers in Microbiology
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
2.75
article

Metagenomics analysis of bacterial community structure from wood- and soil-feeding termites: metabolic pathways and functional structures toward the degradation of lignocellulose and recalcitrant compounds

Jianzhong Sun, Michael Schagerl, Rania Al-Tohamy, Blessing Danso, Sameh S. Ali, Rongrong Xie, Maha A. Khalil
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Some essential information on gut bacterial profiles and their unique contributions to food digestion in wood-feeding termites (WFT) and soil-feeding termites (SFT) is still inadequate. The feeding type of termites is hypothesized to influence their gut bacterial composition and its functionality in degrading lignocellulose or other organic chemicals. This could potentially provide alternative approaches for the degradation of some recalcitrant environmental chemicals. Therefore, metagenomic analysis can be employed to examine the composition and functional profiles of gut bacterial symbionts in WFT and SFT. Based on the metagenomic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequences of gut bacterial symbionts in the WFT, <i>Microcerotermes</i> sp., and the SFT, <i>Pericapritermes nitobei</i>, the findings revealed a total of 26 major bacterial phyla, with 18 phyla commonly represented in both termites, albeit in varying abundances. Spirochaetes dominated the bacterial symbionts in <i>Microcerotermes</i> sp. at 55%, followed by Fibrobacters, while Firmicutes dominated the gut bacteria symbionts in <i>P. nitobei</i> at 95%, with Actinobacteria coming in second at 2%. Furthermore, the Shannon and phylogenetic tree diversity indices, as well as the observed operational taxonomic units and Chao 1 richness indices, were all found to be higher in the WFT than in the SFT deduced from the alpha diversity analysis. Based on the principal coordinate analysis, exhibited a significant distance dissimilarity between the gut bacterial symbionts. The results showed that the gut bacterial composition differed significantly between the WFT and SFT. Furthermore, Tax4Fun analysis evaluated bacterial functions, revealing the predominance of carbohydrate metabolism, followed by amino acid metabolism and energy metabolism in both <i>Microcerotermes</i> sp. and <i>P. nitobei</i> termites. The results implicated that bacterial symbionts inhabiting the guts of both termites were actively involved in the degradation of lignocellulose and other recalcitrant compounds.

Frontiers in MicrobiologyVol. 15
Jiangsu University (CN), University of Vienna (AT), Taif University (SA), Tanta University (EG)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Jiangsu University, Taif University, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
2.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.