New possibilities for surgical treatment of borderline burns using biological wound coverings

Objective: selection of optimal biological wound coverings for the treatment of patients with borderline burns. Material and methods. The results of treatment of 30 patients aged 28-58 years were analyzed. All patients were diagnosed with second degree burn wounds of varying localization and area from 5 to 20% (according to International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision). Of these, 13 (43%) patients in group I (age 48 [39; 54] years) underwent surgical removal of necrosis, and ChitoPran® biological wound dressings were applied to the wounds. The remaining 17 (56%) patients in group II (age 42 [28; 58] years) also underwent early surgical treatment, but the grafts were covered with synthetic Voskopran™ wound coverings. Results. In group I, where the biological wound coating ChitoPran® was used, the epithelialization period was 10 (9.0; 10.0) days. In group II, where the synthetic wound coating Voskopran™ was used, the epithelialization period was 12 (11.0; 13.0) days (p=0.031). The data obtained show that biological wound coatings ChitoPran® demonstrate an advantage in accelerating the timing of wound epithelization compared with synthetic wound coatings Voskopran™. In group I, the duration of hospitalization was 10.5 (10.0; 11.0) days, for group II — 11.5 (10.0; 12.0) days (p=0.048). Conclusion. A comparative assessment of the effectiveness of biological wound coverings in the treatment of patients with borderline burns showed that, in contrast to the synthetic wound covering Voskopran™, the use of the biological wound covering ChitoPran® provides favorable conditions for regeneration, due to which the period of epithelization of wounds was reduced by an average of 1-2 days, and hospitalization time is on average up to 2 days.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15275/ssmj2003273
Primary Topic
Wound Healing and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New possibilities for surgical treatment of borderline burns using biological wound coverings

M. L. Mukhanov, А. В. Каракулев, И. М. Афанасов, С. Б. Богданов et al.
Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research
Wound Healing and Treatments
article

New possibilities for surgical treatment of borderline burns using biological wound coverings

M. L. Mukhanov, А. В. Каракулев, И. М. Афанасов, С. Б. Богданов, V. S. Dutov, S. L. Zaitseva
article en

Abstract

Objective: selection of optimal biological wound coverings for the treatment of patients with borderline burns. Material and methods. The results of treatment of 30 patients aged 28-58 years were analyzed. All patients were diagnosed with second degree burn wounds of varying localization and area from 5 to 20% (according to International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision). Of these, 13 (43%) patients in group I (age 48 [39; 54] years) underwent surgical removal of necrosis, and ChitoPran® biological wound dressings were applied to the wounds. The remaining 17 (56%) patients in group II (age 42 [28; 58] years) also underwent early surgical treatment, but the grafts were covered with synthetic Voskopran™ wound coverings. Results. In group I, where the biological wound coating ChitoPran® was used, the epithelialization period was 10 (9.0; 10.0) days. In group II, where the synthetic wound coating Voskopran™ was used, the epithelialization period was 12 (11.0; 13.0) days (p=0.031). The data obtained show that biological wound coatings ChitoPran® demonstrate an advantage in accelerating the timing of wound epithelization compared with synthetic wound coatings Voskopran™. In group I, the duration of hospitalization was 10.5 (10.0; 11.0) days, for group II — 11.5 (10.0; 12.0) days (p=0.048). Conclusion. A comparative assessment of the effectiveness of biological wound coverings in the treatment of patients with borderline burns showed that, in contrast to the synthetic wound covering Voskopran™, the use of the biological wound covering ChitoPran® provides favorable conditions for regeneration, due to which the period of epithelization of wounds was reduced by an average of 1-2 days, and hospitalization time is on average up to 2 days.

Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific ResearchVol. 20(3)
Kuban State Medical University (RU), Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Moscow State University (TJ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Wound Healing and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.