Review of invasiveness screening kit use in the United States of America

Risk screening is a rapid, cost-effective means of gaining information on risk for large numbers of nonnative species.Professor Gordon H. Copp used the Australian Weed Risk Assessment as a template for creating the Invasiveness Screening Kit (ISK) family of screening tools, including the Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK and FISK v2) and the Aquatic Species Invasiveness Screening Kit (AS-ISK).These tools are effective and practical with numerous applications worldwide.Here we show the influence of Prof. Copp on U.S. management of nonnative aquatic species.We review applications of ISK tools in the USA, present three case studies of applications to U.S. management, and describe management challenges and decisionmaking for U.S. applications.The ISK tools have proven to be versatile and transparent across a wide range of climate zones and geography.Published applications contained 337 species risk assessment area combinations, including 102 marine invertebrates, 6 tunicates, 168 freshwater fishes, 1 brackish fish, 58 marine fishes, 1 amphibian, and 1 bird.The risk assessment areas have ranged from the conterminous USA to regions within states.Basic management decisions supported by these applications include hazard identification, initial risk estimation, and the need for additional assessment.More specific management decisions included commercialization of genetically modified organisms (GMO), national versus subnational risks, dangerous species versus invasive species, established medium-risk species with minimal impacts, risk screens in horizon scanning, and others.These cases involved federal and state agencies and the private sector.Applications in the USA contributed innovations to the field, such as the development of FISK v2 and the first application to a GMO.Professor Copp's contributions to U.S. management have been extraordinary, influencing decisions by agencies and industry, benefitting natural resource protection, and fostering positive economic impacts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Management of Biological Invasions
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2025.16.1.04
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Insect and Pesticide Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review of invasiveness screening kit use in the United States of America

Jeffrey R. Hill
2 citations
Management of Biological Invasions
Insect and Pesticide Research
1.08
article

Review of invasiveness screening kit use in the United States of America

Jeffrey R. Hill
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Risk screening is a rapid, cost-effective means of gaining information on risk for large numbers of nonnative species.Professor Gordon H. Copp used the Australian Weed Risk Assessment as a template for creating the Invasiveness Screening Kit (ISK) family of screening tools, including the Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK and FISK v2) and the Aquatic Species Invasiveness Screening Kit (AS-ISK).These tools are effective and practical with numerous applications worldwide.Here we show the influence of Prof. Copp on U.S. management of nonnative aquatic species.We review applications of ISK tools in the USA, present three case studies of applications to U.S. management, and describe management challenges and decisionmaking for U.S. applications.The ISK tools have proven to be versatile and transparent across a wide range of climate zones and geography.Published applications contained 337 species risk assessment area combinations, including 102 marine invertebrates, 6 tunicates, 168 freshwater fishes, 1 brackish fish, 58 marine fishes, 1 amphibian, and 1 bird.The risk assessment areas have ranged from the conterminous USA to regions within states.Basic management decisions supported by these applications include hazard identification, initial risk estimation, and the need for additional assessment.More specific management decisions included commercialization of genetically modified organisms (GMO), national versus subnational risks, dangerous species versus invasive species, established medium-risk species with minimal impacts, risk screens in horizon scanning, and others.These cases involved federal and state agencies and the private sector.Applications in the USA contributed innovations to the field, such as the development of FISK v2 and the first application to a GMO.Professor Copp's contributions to U.S. management have been extraordinary, influencing decisions by agencies and industry, benefitting natural resource protection, and fostering positive economic impacts.

Management of Biological InvasionsVol. 16(1)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Insect and Pesticide Research
1.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Review of invasiveness screening kit use in the United States of America — Jeffrey R. Hill · Management of Biological Invasions (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS