Multi-method Coal Seam Floor Water Inrush Risk Evaluation Based on Variable Weight Theory

Frequent water inrush disasters in deep coal seam mining pose a significant threat to the safety of coal extraction operations. Due to the complexity and non-linearity of water inrush factors, evaluating the risk of water inrush in coal seam floor is challenging and the results can vary significantly. To achieve more accurate evaluations, the weighted rank-sum method and Grey-TOPSIS method were employed, alongside a master control indicator variable-weight model, for assessing the risk of water inrush in coal seam floor. Validation of the evaluation zoning map against actual conditions revealed that both methods produced accurate assessment results, thus affirming the reliability of the new evaluation approach. Compared with the water inrush coefficient method, the diversification of index factors weakened the absolute control effect of the water inrush threshold. The evaluation outcomes were more systematic and comprehensive, providing a new methodology and perspective for deep coal seam mining.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Exploration & Exploitation
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01445987241295833
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Geoscience and Mining Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-method Coal Seam Floor Water Inrush Risk Evaluation Based on Variable Weight Theory

Fuxun Sun, Fuzhu Wu, Jiamin Du, Zhaoqun Zhu et al.
4 citations
Energy Exploration & Exploitation
Geoscience and Mining Technology
1.46
article

Multi-method Coal Seam Floor Water Inrush Risk Evaluation Based on Variable Weight Theory

Fuxun Sun, Fuzhu Wu, Jiamin Du, Zhaoqun Zhu, Gen Chen, Feijun Jiang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Frequent water inrush disasters in deep coal seam mining pose a significant threat to the safety of coal extraction operations. Due to the complexity and non-linearity of water inrush factors, evaluating the risk of water inrush in coal seam floor is challenging and the results can vary significantly. To achieve more accurate evaluations, the weighted rank-sum method and Grey-TOPSIS method were employed, alongside a master control indicator variable-weight model, for assessing the risk of water inrush in coal seam floor. Validation of the evaluation zoning map against actual conditions revealed that both methods produced accurate assessment results, thus affirming the reliability of the new evaluation approach. Compared with the water inrush coefficient method, the diversification of index factors weakened the absolute control effect of the water inrush threshold. The evaluation outcomes were more systematic and comprehensive, providing a new methodology and perspective for deep coal seam mining.

Energy Exploration & ExploitationVol. 43(2)
Hebei University of Engineering (CN), Geological Exploration Institute of Shandong Zhengyuan (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Department, Department of Education of Hebei Province, Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Geoscience and Mining Technology
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Multi-method Coal Seam Floor Water Inrush Risk Evaluation Based on Variable Weight Theory — Fuxun Sun, Fuzhu Wu, et al. · Energy Exploration & Exploitation (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS