Weed communities of snap bean fields in the United States

Abstract Weeds are one of the greatest challenges to snap bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) production. Anecdotal observation posits certain species frequently escape the weed management system by the time of crop harvest, hereafter called residual weeds. The objectives of this work were to (1) quantify the residual weed community in snap bean grown for processing across the major growing regions in the United States and (2) investigate linkages between the density of residual weeds and their contributions to weed canopy cover. In surveys of 358 fields across the Northwest (NW), Midwest (MW), and Northeast (NE), residual weeds were observed in 95% of the fields. While a total of 109 species or species-groups were identified, one to three species dominated the residual weed community of individual fields in most cases. It was not uncommon to have >10 weeds m −2 with a weed canopy covering >5% of the field’s surface area. Some of the most abundant and problematic species or species-groups escaping control included amaranth species such as smooth pigweed ( Amaranthus hybridus L.), Palmer amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson), redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus L.), and waterhemp [ Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) Sauer]; common lambsquarters ( Chenopodium album L.); large crabgrass [ Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.]; and ivyleaf morningglory ( Ipomoea hederacea Jacq.). Emerging threats include hophornbeam copperleaf ( Acalypha ostryifolia Riddell) in the MW and sharppoint fluvellin [ Kickxia elatine (L.) Dumort.] in the NW. Beyond crop losses due to weed interference, the weed canopy at harvest poses a risk to contaminating snap bean products with foreign material. Random forest modeling predicts the residual weed canopy is dominated by C. album , D. sanguinalis , carpetweed ( Mollugo verticillata L.), I. hederacea , amaranth species, and A. ostryifolia . This is the first quantitative report on the weed community escaping control in U.S. snap bean production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Weed Science
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2024.76
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Plant Parasitism and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weed communities of snap bean fields in the United States

Pavle Pavlović, Carolyn J. Lowry, Lynn M. Sosnoskie, Martin Williams et al.
3 citations
Weed Science
Plant Parasitism and Resistance
1.80
article

Weed communities of snap bean fields in the United States

Pavle Pavlović, Carolyn J. Lowry, Lynn M. Sosnoskie, Martin Williams, Ed Peachey, Barbara A. Scott, Jed B. Colquhoun, Nicholas E. Korres, Mark J. VanGessel, Rui Liu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Weeds are one of the greatest challenges to snap bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) production. Anecdotal observation posits certain species frequently escape the weed management system by the time of crop harvest, hereafter called residual weeds. The objectives of this work were to (1) quantify the residual weed community in snap bean grown for processing across the major growing regions in the United States and (2) investigate linkages between the density of residual weeds and their contributions to weed canopy cover. In surveys of 358 fields across the Northwest (NW), Midwest (MW), and Northeast (NE), residual weeds were observed in 95% of the fields. While a total of 109 species or species-groups were identified, one to three species dominated the residual weed community of individual fields in most cases. It was not uncommon to have >10 weeds m −2 with a weed canopy covering >5% of the field’s surface area. Some of the most abundant and problematic species or species-groups escaping control included amaranth species such as smooth pigweed ( Amaranthus hybridus L.), Palmer amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson), redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus L.), and waterhemp [ Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) Sauer]; common lambsquarters ( Chenopodium album L.); large crabgrass [ Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.]; and ivyleaf morningglory ( Ipomoea hederacea Jacq.). Emerging threats include hophornbeam copperleaf ( Acalypha ostryifolia Riddell) in the MW and sharppoint fluvellin [ Kickxia elatine (L.) Dumort.] in the NW. Beyond crop losses due to weed interference, the weed canopy at harvest poses a risk to contaminating snap bean products with foreign material. Random forest modeling predicts the residual weed canopy is dominated by C. album , D. sanguinalis , carpetweed ( Mollugo verticillata L.), I. hederacea , amaranth species, and A. ostryifolia . This is the first quantitative report on the weed community escaping control in U.S. snap bean production.

Weed ScienceVol. 73
Pennsylvania State University (US), Oregon State University (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Urbana University (US), Cornell University (US), Washington State University (US), University of Delaware (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Plant Parasitism and Resistance
1.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.