Optimizing VLSI Design Verification with Histogram-Based Difference Algorithm

Abstract: This research explores the optimization of Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) plan confirmation utilizing the Histogram-Based Distinction Calculation (HBDA) and compares its execution with conventional calculations. Through comprehensive tests, HBDA illustrates predominant confirmation speed, precision, and asset utilization compared to ordinary strategies such as Exhaustive Comparison Algorithm (ECA), Cross-Correlation Calculation (CCA), and Energetic Time Twisting Calculation (DTWA). Particularly, HBDA accomplishes a normal confirmation speed of 25 milliseconds, with a precision of 98.5% and asset utilization of 75%. In differentiation, ECA shows slower confirmation speed (150 milliseconds) and higher asset utilization (100%), whereas CCA and DTWA appear halfway in execution in terms of speed, exactness, and asset utilization. The related work survey highlights different inventive strategies in VLSI plan and optimization, counting neuromorphic computing, vitality gathering, and IoT frameworks. By and large, this research contributes to progressing VLSI plan confirmation techniques, advertising a more effective and solid approach to guarantee the usefulness and unwavering quality of cutting-edge electronic frameworks.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Nonlinear Variational Inequalities
Published
2024-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52783/anvi.v27.1444
Primary Topic
VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing VLSI Design Verification with Histogram-Based Difference Algorithm

Rajesh Kedarnath Navandar
Advances in Nonlinear Variational Inequalities
VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
article

Optimizing VLSI Design Verification with Histogram-Based Difference Algorithm

Rajesh Kedarnath Navandar
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This research explores the optimization of Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) plan confirmation utilizing the Histogram-Based Distinction Calculation (HBDA) and compares its execution with conventional calculations. Through comprehensive tests, HBDA illustrates predominant confirmation speed, precision, and asset utilization compared to ordinary strategies such as Exhaustive Comparison Algorithm (ECA), Cross-Correlation Calculation (CCA), and Energetic Time Twisting Calculation (DTWA). Particularly, HBDA accomplishes a normal confirmation speed of 25 milliseconds, with a precision of 98.5% and asset utilization of 75%. In differentiation, ECA shows slower confirmation speed (150 milliseconds) and higher asset utilization (100%), whereas CCA and DTWA appear halfway in execution in terms of speed, exactness, and asset utilization. The related work survey highlights different inventive strategies in VLSI plan and optimization, counting neuromorphic computing, vitality gathering, and IoT frameworks. By and large, this research contributes to progressing VLSI plan confirmation techniques, advertising a more effective and solid approach to guarantee the usefulness and unwavering quality of cutting-edge electronic frameworks.

Advances in Nonlinear Variational InequalitiesVol. 27(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Optimizing VLSI Design Verification with Histogram-Based Difference Algorithm — Rajesh Kedarnath Navandar · Advances in Nonlinear Variational Inequalities (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS