How do young soccer players train? A 5-year analysis of weekly microcycle training load characteristics in an elite youth academy

This study aimed to describe the distribution of training load (session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE), duration, and sRPE-training load) across weekly microcycles of an elite youth academy and assess the differences between four different age groups (U15-U16-U17-U19). Training load variables were recorded during in-season training weeks over 5 competitive seasons (from 2014–15 to 2018–19, evaluating new squads for each age group each season) for a total of 456 player observations. Mixed models assessed the variability of the three load variables across the different training days of a weekly microcycle and between the four different age groups. Estimated marginal means, 95% confidence intervals (CI), and effect sizes (d) were calculated for each training day of the microcycle. The main findings were significant differences in the training load variables three and four days before the next Match Day (i.e., MD-3 and MD-4, respectively), with U15 recording lower sRPE (−2.0 AU, d = 0.43–0.72) and U19 a lower duration (−35 min, d < -1.10). All age groups reduced sRPE-training load in the two days before a match, mainly due to a decrease in training duration (−160 AU & −17 min respectively). Match days provided the highest training loads within the weekly microcycle, with moderate-to-large differences between the four age groups (d = 0.77, 1.16 and 1.38 for U15 vs U16-U17-U19 respectively). The low variability in sRPE values in the three central sessions of a weekly microcycle indicates that training duration is an important factor to control when aiming to manipulate within-week training loads in elite youth soccer players.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541241292765
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How do young soccer players train? A 5-year analysis of weekly microcycle training load characteristics in an elite youth academy

Antonio R. Gualtieri, Sean Stolp, Duccio Ferrari Bravo, Ermanno Rampinini et al.
5 citations
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Sports Performance and Training
2.39
article

How do young soccer players train? A 5-year analysis of weekly microcycle training load characteristics in an elite youth academy

Antonio R. Gualtieri, Sean Stolp, Duccio Ferrari Bravo, Ermanno Rampinini, Alberto Franceschi, Aaron J. Coutts, Darragh R. Connolly
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the distribution of training load (session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE), duration, and sRPE-training load) across weekly microcycles of an elite youth academy and assess the differences between four different age groups (U15-U16-U17-U19). Training load variables were recorded during in-season training weeks over 5 competitive seasons (from 2014–15 to 2018–19, evaluating new squads for each age group each season) for a total of 456 player observations. Mixed models assessed the variability of the three load variables across the different training days of a weekly microcycle and between the four different age groups. Estimated marginal means, 95% confidence intervals (CI), and effect sizes (d) were calculated for each training day of the microcycle. The main findings were significant differences in the training load variables three and four days before the next Match Day (i.e., MD-3 and MD-4, respectively), with U15 recording lower sRPE (−2.0 AU, d = 0.43–0.72) and U19 a lower duration (−35 min, d < -1.10). All age groups reduced sRPE-training load in the two days before a match, mainly due to a decrease in training duration (−160 AU & −17 min respectively). Match days provided the highest training loads within the weekly microcycle, with moderate-to-large differences between the four age groups (d = 0.77, 1.16 and 1.38 for U15 vs U16-U17-U19 respectively). The low variability in sRPE values in the three central sessions of a weekly microcycle indicates that training duration is an important factor to control when aiming to manipulate within-week training loads in elite youth soccer players.

International Journal of Sports Science & CoachingVol. 20(1)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), University of Suffolk (GB), Torino e-district (IT), Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Sports Performance and Training
2.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.