External Short-Circuit Scenarios under Different Mechanical Pressures Applied to Lithium-Ion Cells with Silicon-Dominant Anodes
The safety behavior of lithium-ion cells using high contents of silicon as new anode active material was barely investigated. This work investigates the short-circuit behavior of self-manufactured single-layered pouch cells using 70 wt% microscale silicon and NCA cathodes in a novel dual reference cell setup consisting of a gold wire and a lithium metal reference electrode. Six cells were externally shortened at three different pressure settings using a novel developed quasi-isothermal calorimetric short-circuit test bench. The same current plateaus and transition zones were observed for all pressure settings, as reported in the literature for graphite-containing anodes. In addition, a direct dependency of the short-circuit intensity and the heat generation is measured for the differently compressed cells. This higher short-circuit intensity was quantitatively explained by the decreasing impedance at increased pressure settings. The built-in reference electrodes allow monitoring of the negative terminal potential, revealing potentials of up to 3.508 V versus Li + /Li and thus explaining the measured over-discharge in the range of ≈25% SoC. The post-mortem analysis reveals copper deposition on both electrodes and the separator, confirming the electrochemically measured over-discharge. Linear scans and potential trajectories reveal 3.379 V versus Li + /Li as oxidation potential for copper dissolution using copper∣∣lithium metal coin cells.
Authors
- Andreas Jossen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0964-1405)
- Sven Friedrich (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1772-8076)
- Vitaly Savvin
- Rebecca Wilhelm (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4161-5197)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 2024-11-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ad9355
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.83