Cu-Supported ZnO under Conditions of CO <sub>2</sub> Reduction to Methanol: Why 0.2 ML Coverage?

By hydrogenating carbon dioxide to value-added products such as methanol, heterogeneous catalysts can lower greenhouse gas emissions and generate alternative liquid fuels. The most common commercial catalyst for the reduction of CO<sub>2</sub> to methanol is Cu/ZnO/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, where ZnO improves conversion and selectivity toward methanol. The structure of this catalyst is thought to be Zn oxy(hydroxyl) overlayers on the nanometer scale on Cu. In the presence of CO<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub> under reaction conditions, the Cu substrate itself can be restructured and/or partially oxidized at its interface with ZnO, or the Zn might be reduced, possibly completely to a CuZn alloy, making the exact structure and stoichiometry of the active site a topic of active debate. In this study, we examine Zn<sub>3</sub> clusters on Cu(100) and Cu(111), as a subnano model of the catalyst. We use a grand canonical genetic algorithm to sample the system structure and stoichiometry under catalytic conditions: <i>T</i> of 550 K, initial partial pressures of H<sub>2</sub> of 4.5 atm and CO<sub>2</sub> of 0.5 atm, and 1% conversion. We uncover a strong dependence of the catalyst stoichiometry on the surface coverage. At the optimal 0.2 ML surface coverage, chains of Zn(OH) form on both Cu surfaces. On Cu(100), the catalyst has many thermally accessible metastable minima, whereas on Cu(111), it does not. No oxidation or reconstruction of the Cu is found. However, at a lower coverage of Zn, Zn<sub>3</sub> clusters take on a metallic form on Cu(100), and slightly oxidized Zn<sub>3</sub>O on Cu(111), while the surface uptakes H to form a variety of low hydrides of Cu. We thus hypothesize that the 0.2 ML Zn coverage is optimal, as found experimentally, because of the stronger yet incomplete oxidation afforded by Zn at this coverage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c02908
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cu-Supported ZnO under Conditions of CO 2 Reduction to Methanol: Why 0.2 ML Coverage?

Anastassia N. Alexandrova, Zisheng Zhang, Philippe Sautet, Robert H. Lavroff et al.
6 citations
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
0.70
article

Cu-Supported ZnO under Conditions of CO 2 Reduction to Methanol: Why 0.2 ML Coverage?

Anastassia N. Alexandrova, Zisheng Zhang, Philippe Sautet, Robert H. Lavroff, Kaustubh J. Sawant, Edison Cummings
article en
6 citations

Abstract

By hydrogenating carbon dioxide to value-added products such as methanol, heterogeneous catalysts can lower greenhouse gas emissions and generate alternative liquid fuels. The most common commercial catalyst for the reduction of CO<sub>2</sub> to methanol is Cu/ZnO/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, where ZnO improves conversion and selectivity toward methanol. The structure of this catalyst is thought to be Zn oxy(hydroxyl) overlayers on the nanometer scale on Cu. In the presence of CO<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub> under reaction conditions, the Cu substrate itself can be restructured and/or partially oxidized at its interface with ZnO, or the Zn might be reduced, possibly completely to a CuZn alloy, making the exact structure and stoichiometry of the active site a topic of active debate. In this study, we examine Zn<sub>3</sub> clusters on Cu(100) and Cu(111), as a subnano model of the catalyst. We use a grand canonical genetic algorithm to sample the system structure and stoichiometry under catalytic conditions: <i>T</i> of 550 K, initial partial pressures of H<sub>2</sub> of 4.5 atm and CO<sub>2</sub> of 0.5 atm, and 1% conversion. We uncover a strong dependence of the catalyst stoichiometry on the surface coverage. At the optimal 0.2 ML surface coverage, chains of Zn(OH) form on both Cu surfaces. On Cu(100), the catalyst has many thermally accessible metastable minima, whereas on Cu(111), it does not. No oxidation or reconstruction of the Cu is found. However, at a lower coverage of Zn, Zn<sub>3</sub> clusters take on a metallic form on Cu(100), and slightly oxidized Zn<sub>3</sub>O on Cu(111), while the surface uptakes H to form a variety of low hydrides of Cu. We thus hypothesize that the 0.2 ML Zn coverage is optimal, as found experimentally, because of the stronger yet incomplete oxidation afforded by Zn at this coverage.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry LettersVol. 15(47)
California NanoSystems Institute (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Argonne National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
0.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.