Long-term effects of the Targeting the Ultra Poor program—A reproducibility and replicability assessment of Banerjee et al. (2021)

Abstract Banerjee, Duflo, and Sharma (BDS, 2021, American Economic Review: Insights, 3, 471–86) conduct a 10-year follow-up of a randomized transfer program in West Bengal. BDS find large effects on consumption, food security, income, and health. We conduct a replicability assessment. First, we successfully reproduce the results, thanks to a perfectly documented reproduction package. Results are robust across alternative specifications. We furthermore assess the paper's pre-specification diligence and the reporting in terms of external and construct validity. While the paper refers to a pre-registration, it lacks a pre-analysis plan. Assessing the validity of findings for other contexts is difficult absent necessary details about the exact treatment delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Q Open
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoae031
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-term effects of the Targeting the Ultra Poor program—A reproducibility and replicability assessment of Banerjee et al. (2021)

Jörg Peters, Julian Rose, Florian Neubauer
2 citations
Q Open
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
1.05
article

Long-term effects of the Targeting the Ultra Poor program—A reproducibility and replicability assessment of Banerjee et al. (2021)

Jörg Peters, Julian Rose, Florian Neubauer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Banerjee, Duflo, and Sharma (BDS, 2021, American Economic Review: Insights, 3, 471–86) conduct a 10-year follow-up of a randomized transfer program in West Bengal. BDS find large effects on consumption, food security, income, and health. We conduct a replicability assessment. First, we successfully reproduce the results, thanks to a perfectly documented reproduction package. Results are robust across alternative specifications. We furthermore assess the paper's pre-specification diligence and the reporting in terms of external and construct validity. While the paper refers to a pre-registration, it lacks a pre-analysis plan. Assessing the validity of findings for other contexts is difficult absent necessary details about the exact treatment delivery.

Q OpenVol. 5(3)
RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research (DE), University of Passau (DE), LMU Klinikum (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.