Measuring River Surface Velocity Using UAS‐Borne Doppler Radar

Abstract Using Unoccupied Aerial Systems (UAS) equipped with optical RGB cameras and Doppler radar, surface velocity can be efficiently measured at high spatial resolution. UAS‐borne Doppler radar is particularly attractive because it is suitable for real‐time velocity determination, because the measurement is contactless, and because it has fewer limitations than image velocimetry techniques. In this paper, five cross‐sections (XSs) were surveyed within a 10 km stretch of Rönne River in Sweden. Ground‐truth surface velocity observations were retrieved with an electromagnetic velocity sensor (OTT MF Pro) along the XS at one m spacing. Videos from a UAS RGB camera were analyzed using both Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) and Space‐Time Image Velocimetry (STIV) techniques. Furthermore, we recorded full waveform signal data using a Doppler radar at multiple waypoints across the river. An algorithm fits two alternative models to the average amplitude curve to derive the correct river surface velocity based on Gaussian models with: (a) one peak, and (b) two peaks. Results indicate that river flow velocity and propwash velocity caused by the drone can be found in XS where the flow velocity is low, while the drone‐induced propwash velocity can be neglected in fast and highly turbulent flows. To verify the river flow velocity derived from Doppler radar, a mean PIV value within the footprint of the Doppler radar at each waypoint was calculated. Finally, quantitative comparisons of OTT MF Pro data with STIV, mean PIV and Doppler radar revealed that UAS‐borne Doppler radar could reliably measure the river surface velocity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Resources Research
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr037375
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring River Surface Velocity Using UAS‐Borne Doppler Radar

Alexey Dobrovolskiy, Peter Bauer‐Gottwein, Henrik Grosen, Zhou Zhen et al.
9 citations
Water Resources Research
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
2.54
article

Measuring River Surface Velocity Using UAS‐Borne Doppler Radar

Alexey Dobrovolskiy, Peter Bauer‐Gottwein, Henrik Grosen, Zhou Zhen, Niksa Orlic, Daniel Olesen, David Gustafsson, Tomislav Grubeša, Viktor Fagerström, Mónica Coppo Frías, Alexey Kadek, Alexander Rietz Vesterhauge, Luka Drmić, Jenny Axén, Laura Riis‐Klinkvort, Christine Lindenhoff, Makar Lavish, Emilie Ahrnkiel Jørgensen, Sune F. Nielsen, Daniel Wennerberg
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Abstract Using Unoccupied Aerial Systems (UAS) equipped with optical RGB cameras and Doppler radar, surface velocity can be efficiently measured at high spatial resolution. UAS‐borne Doppler radar is particularly attractive because it is suitable for real‐time velocity determination, because the measurement is contactless, and because it has fewer limitations than image velocimetry techniques. In this paper, five cross‐sections (XSs) were surveyed within a 10 km stretch of Rönne River in Sweden. Ground‐truth surface velocity observations were retrieved with an electromagnetic velocity sensor (OTT MF Pro) along the XS at one m spacing. Videos from a UAS RGB camera were analyzed using both Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) and Space‐Time Image Velocimetry (STIV) techniques. Furthermore, we recorded full waveform signal data using a Doppler radar at multiple waypoints across the river. An algorithm fits two alternative models to the average amplitude curve to derive the correct river surface velocity based on Gaussian models with: (a) one peak, and (b) two peaks. Results indicate that river flow velocity and propwash velocity caused by the drone can be found in XS where the flow velocity is low, while the drone‐induced propwash velocity can be neglected in fast and highly turbulent flows. To verify the river flow velocity derived from Doppler radar, a mean PIV value within the footprint of the Doppler radar at each waypoint was calculated. Finally, quantitative comparisons of OTT MF Pro data with STIV, mean PIV and Doppler radar revealed that UAS‐borne Doppler radar could reliably measure the river surface velocity.

Water Resources ResearchVol. 60(11)
Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SE), Aarhus GeoSoftware (Denmark) (DK), Croatian Geological Survey (HR), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
2.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.