Common Institutional Ownership and Corporate Carbon Emissions

Abstract There has been a growing interest in comparative work exploring when and why firms embark on green paths. It has been concluded that in national contexts where inter‐firm ties are stronger, progress has been stronger. In turn, this raises questions about the impact of inter‐firm ties within, rather than between, national contexts, and in settings where progress towards renewables has been uneven and contested. Accordingly, we explore how common institutional ownership may foster collaboration among firms within the same industry against climate change. Using a sample of US‐listed firms from 2006 to 2019, we obtain robust evidence that firms with industrial peers that are owned by the same institutional investors have lower carbon emissions. In addition, we find that a threshold exists for which the impact on carbon emissions holds only when firms are commonly connected with a substantial number of peers. The existence of this threshold suggests potential free‐riding issues and highlights the beneficial role of investors in promoting cross‐industry collaboration. Overall, our results highlight the role played by institutional investors in tackling climate issues, with important implications for both climate‐ and antitrust‐related regulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Management
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12878
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Common Institutional Ownership and Corporate Carbon Emissions

Geoffrey Wood, Dayong Zhang, Lei Lei, Qiang Ji
11 citations
British Journal of Management
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
10.41
article

Common Institutional Ownership and Corporate Carbon Emissions

Geoffrey Wood, Dayong Zhang, Lei Lei, Qiang Ji
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Abstract There has been a growing interest in comparative work exploring when and why firms embark on green paths. It has been concluded that in national contexts where inter‐firm ties are stronger, progress has been stronger. In turn, this raises questions about the impact of inter‐firm ties within, rather than between, national contexts, and in settings where progress towards renewables has been uneven and contested. Accordingly, we explore how common institutional ownership may foster collaboration among firms within the same industry against climate change. Using a sample of US‐listed firms from 2006 to 2019, we obtain robust evidence that firms with industrial peers that are owned by the same institutional investors have lower carbon emissions. In addition, we find that a threshold exists for which the impact on carbon emissions holds only when firms are commonly connected with a substantial number of peers. The existence of this threshold suggests potential free‐riding issues and highlights the beneficial role of investors in promoting cross‐industry collaboration. Overall, our results highlight the role played by institutional investors in tackling climate issues, with important implications for both climate‐ and antitrust‐related regulations.

British Journal of ManagementVol. 36(2)
Western University (CA), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Southwestern University of Finance and Economics (CN), Institutes of Science and Development (CN), Institute of Economics (CN), University of Bath (GB), Cranfield University (GB)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
10.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.