Study on Tree Volume Measurement Using Terrestial and Airbone Laser Scanners†

This study aimed to utilize LiDAR, a high-precision surveying technology, to compensate for errors caused by human measurements and obtain accurate and consistent data for tree volume measurement. To this end, a comparative verification of measured tree volume values by each method was conducted using terrestrial LiDAR (TLS) and drone LiDAR (ALS). As a result of examining the 3D data of trees according to the measurement method, it was confirmed that the output data of terrestrial LiDAR had insufficient crowns, and the output data of drone LiDAR had insufficient trunks. Therefore, the study attempted to establish a complete form by aligning the two data sets. In addition, two verifications of tree volume values were conducted using the point cloud data output by each method. As a result of the first verification, the accuracy verification of terrestrial LiDAR showed a difference of 1-3 m in tree height compared to the existing field survey measurement value. The discrepancy is believed to be due to the density of trees or terrain and features according to the principle of LiDAR. In the second verification, terrestrial LIDAR, drone LIDAR, terrestrial LIDAR, and drone LIDAR alignment data were compared. In order to compare the tree height and breast height diameter according to each measurement method, Bland-Altman descriptive statistics were performed based on the field survey measurement values. Considering the results, the drone LIDAR measurement method showed the highest repeatability coefficient, indicating the least consistency, while the drone and terrestrial LIDAR alignment data values showed the lowest repeatability coefficient, indicating high consistency. For the breast height diameter, the terrestrial LIDAR measurement method showed a low repeatability coefficient similar to the drone and terrestrial LIDAR alignment data values, indicating high consistency. Therefore, it is judged that the method of overlapping drone and terrestrial LIDAR data when measuring the structure of trees can derive more precise tree volume information.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9715/kila.2024.52.5.042
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study on Tree Volume Measurement Using Terrestial and Airbone Laser Scanners†

Tobias Jung, K. Park, Seonghyeok Seo
1 citations
Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
0.21
article

Study on Tree Volume Measurement Using Terrestial and Airbone Laser Scanners†

Tobias Jung, K. Park, Seonghyeok Seo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to utilize LiDAR, a high-precision surveying technology, to compensate for errors caused by human measurements and obtain accurate and consistent data for tree volume measurement. To this end, a comparative verification of measured tree volume values by each method was conducted using terrestrial LiDAR (TLS) and drone LiDAR (ALS). As a result of examining the 3D data of trees according to the measurement method, it was confirmed that the output data of terrestrial LiDAR had insufficient crowns, and the output data of drone LiDAR had insufficient trunks. Therefore, the study attempted to establish a complete form by aligning the two data sets. In addition, two verifications of tree volume values were conducted using the point cloud data output by each method. As a result of the first verification, the accuracy verification of terrestrial LiDAR showed a difference of 1-3 m in tree height compared to the existing field survey measurement value. The discrepancy is believed to be due to the density of trees or terrain and features according to the principle of LiDAR. In the second verification, terrestrial LIDAR, drone LIDAR, terrestrial LIDAR, and drone LIDAR alignment data were compared. In order to compare the tree height and breast height diameter according to each measurement method, Bland-Altman descriptive statistics were performed based on the field survey measurement values. Considering the results, the drone LIDAR measurement method showed the highest repeatability coefficient, indicating the least consistency, while the drone and terrestrial LIDAR alignment data values showed the lowest repeatability coefficient, indicating high consistency. For the breast height diameter, the terrestrial LIDAR measurement method showed a low repeatability coefficient similar to the drone and terrestrial LIDAR alignment data values, indicating high consistency. Therefore, it is judged that the method of overlapping drone and terrestrial LIDAR data when measuring the structure of trees can derive more precise tree volume information.

Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape ArchitectureVol. 52(5)
Ministry of Education, National Research Foundation of Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Study on Tree Volume Measurement Using Terrestial and Airbone Laser Scanners† — Tobias Jung, K. Park, et al. · Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS