Anomaly Detection in Video Surveillance: A Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models

Anomaly detection in video surveillance is critical for enhancing security and public safety across various applications, including traffic monitoring, public spaces, and industrial settings. Traditional methods often struggle with the complexity and variability of real-world data, prompting a shift towards advanced machine learning models. This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of deep learning algorithms, including YOLOv5, 3D CNNs, LSTM, Deep SVDD, Vision Transformers, Temporal Transformers, and Autoencoders, applied to three benchmark datasets: CIFAR-10, MVTec AD, and UCSD Anomaly Detection. We compare these algorithms based on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, providing insight into their strengths and weaknesses. The results suggest that Vision Transformers and CNN-LSTM hybrids offer superior performance across spatial and temporal anomaly detection tasks.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Panamerican mathematical journal.
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52783/pmj.v34.i3.1778
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anomaly Detection in Video Surveillance: A Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models

Sangita Mahendra Rajput
Panamerican mathematical journal.
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
article

Anomaly Detection in Video Surveillance: A Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models

Sangita Mahendra Rajput
article en

Abstract

Anomaly detection in video surveillance is critical for enhancing security and public safety across various applications, including traffic monitoring, public spaces, and industrial settings. Traditional methods often struggle with the complexity and variability of real-world data, prompting a shift towards advanced machine learning models. This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of deep learning algorithms, including YOLOv5, 3D CNNs, LSTM, Deep SVDD, Vision Transformers, Temporal Transformers, and Autoencoders, applied to three benchmark datasets: CIFAR-10, MVTec AD, and UCSD Anomaly Detection. We compare these algorithms based on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, providing insight into their strengths and weaknesses. The results suggest that Vision Transformers and CNN-LSTM hybrids offer superior performance across spatial and temporal anomaly detection tasks.

Panamerican mathematical journal.Vol. 34(3)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.