The survival rate of biological therapy in immunosuppressive diseases in children

Genetically engineered biological preparations (GEBP) are successfully used in various immunosuppressive diseases. Despite the effectiveness of GEBP, some patients experience primary non-response, as well as loss of effect from therapy. There is a need to objectively assess the effect of the therapy for its timely correction. The aim of the work was to determine the survival rate of GIBP depending on the form of pathology, drug, age, and immune indices in children with Crohn’s disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), psoriasis (PS), multiple sclerosis (MS). Materials and methods. Three hundred eighty three children (1394 observations) were examined in dynamics: 117 children with BC (treated by infliximab (IFX)/adalimumab (ADA), 83 children with UC (IFX/ADA), 87 children with PS (ADA), 96 children with PC (IFNβ1α) during the maintenance course therapy. Lymphocytes were immunophenotyped by flow cytometry with the determination of Treg (CD4+CD25highCD127low), Th17 lymphocytes (CD4+CD161+CD3+), succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) activity in Treg. Data processing was carried out using Statistica 16.0 application. Kaplan–Mayer survival curves are constructed. The significance of the differences between the groups was assessed using the Gehan–Wilcoxon criterion (p < 0.05). Results. The survival rate of biological therapy in CD patients on IFX therapy is significantly higher than in children with UC — 161 weeks versus 135 weeks. There was no difference in CBT on ADA therapy between patients with CD and UC. The IBT index depends on the age of the patients: on IFX therapy (159 weeks) the best indices were in CD patients over 12 years. Combination therapy improves the survival of TNF blockers in patients with IBD (azathioprine) and PS (methotrexate). The survival of GIBP is influenced by the ratio of effector and regulatory cells (Th17|Treg) and the functional activity of Treg (SDH activity). A decrease in IBD was revealed in patients with IBD, PS, and MS with an increase in the Th17/Treg index above the age norm and a decrease in the activity of SDH in Treg below the norm. Conclusion. The survival rate of biological therapy for immunosuppressive diseases in children depends on the form of pathology, the drug, the age of patients, previous therapy, combination therapy, as well as immune indices during the maintenance course. Monitoring of Th17/Treg and SDH activity in Treg may be an important laboratory criterion for the effectiveness of GIBP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Pediatric Journal
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46563/1560-9561-2024-27-5-322-330
Primary Topic
Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The survival rate of biological therapy in immunosuppressive diseases in children

Elena L. Semikina, О. В. Курбатова, А. С. Потапов, Nikolay N. Murashkin et al.
Russian Pediatric Journal
Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
article

The survival rate of biological therapy in immunosuppressive diseases in children

Elena L. Semikina, О. В. Курбатова, А. С. Потапов, Nikolay N. Murashkin, Т. В. Радыгина, Д. Г. Купцова, Luizat М. Abdullaeva, Л. М. Кузенкова, Аndrey P. Fisenko, С. В. Петричук, Ekaterina V. Freydlin
article en

Abstract

Genetically engineered biological preparations (GEBP) are successfully used in various immunosuppressive diseases. Despite the effectiveness of GEBP, some patients experience primary non-response, as well as loss of effect from therapy. There is a need to objectively assess the effect of the therapy for its timely correction. The aim of the work was to determine the survival rate of GIBP depending on the form of pathology, drug, age, and immune indices in children with Crohn’s disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), psoriasis (PS), multiple sclerosis (MS). Materials and methods. Three hundred eighty three children (1394 observations) were examined in dynamics: 117 children with BC (treated by infliximab (IFX)/adalimumab (ADA), 83 children with UC (IFX/ADA), 87 children with PS (ADA), 96 children with PC (IFNβ1α) during the maintenance course therapy. Lymphocytes were immunophenotyped by flow cytometry with the determination of Treg (CD4+CD25highCD127low), Th17 lymphocytes (CD4+CD161+CD3+), succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) activity in Treg. Data processing was carried out using Statistica 16.0 application. Kaplan–Mayer survival curves are constructed. The significance of the differences between the groups was assessed using the Gehan–Wilcoxon criterion (p < 0.05). Results. The survival rate of biological therapy in CD patients on IFX therapy is significantly higher than in children with UC — 161 weeks versus 135 weeks. There was no difference in CBT on ADA therapy between patients with CD and UC. The IBT index depends on the age of the patients: on IFX therapy (159 weeks) the best indices were in CD patients over 12 years. Combination therapy improves the survival of TNF blockers in patients with IBD (azathioprine) and PS (methotrexate). The survival of GIBP is influenced by the ratio of effector and regulatory cells (Th17|Treg) and the functional activity of Treg (SDH activity). A decrease in IBD was revealed in patients with IBD, PS, and MS with an increase in the Th17/Treg index above the age norm and a decrease in the activity of SDH in Treg below the norm. Conclusion. The survival rate of biological therapy for immunosuppressive diseases in children depends on the form of pathology, the drug, the age of patients, previous therapy, combination therapy, as well as immune indices during the maintenance course. Monitoring of Th17/Treg and SDH activity in Treg may be an important laboratory criterion for the effectiveness of GIBP.

Russian Pediatric JournalVol. 27(5)
Sechenov University (RU), Center for Children (US), Central State Medical Academy (RU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.