Hardness of Approximate Diameter: Now for Undirected Graphs
Approximating the graph diameter is a basic task of both theoretical and practical interest. A simple folklore algorithm can output a 2-approximation to the diameter in linear time by running BFS from an arbitrary vertex. It has been open whether a better approximation is possible in near-linear time. A series of articles on fine-grained complexity have led to strong hardness results for diameter in directed graphs, culminating in a recent tradeoff curve independently discovered by [Li, STOC’21] and [Dalirrooyfard and Wein, STOC’21], showing that under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH), for any integer k ≥ 2 and δ > 0, a \(2-\frac{1}{k}-\delta\) approximation for diameter in directed m -edge graphs requires \(m^{1+1/(k-1)-o(1)}\) time. In particular, the simple linear time 2-approximation algorithm is optimal for directed graphs. In this article, we prove that the same tradeoff lower bound curve is possible for undirected graphs as well, extending results of [Roditty and Vassilevska W., STOC’13], [Li’20] and [Bonnet, ICALP’21] who proved the first few cases of the curve, k =2,3, and 4, respectively. Our result shows in particular that the simple linear time 2-approximation algorithm is conditionally optimal for undirected graphs. To obtain our result, we extract the core ideas in known reductions and introduce a unification and generalization that could be useful for proving SETH-based hardness for other problems in undirected graphs related to distance computation.
Authors
- Mina Dalirrooyfard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7797-3690)
- Virginia Vassilevska Williams (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4844-2863)
- Ray Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3441-2364)
Institutions
- Santa Clara University (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of the ACM
- Published
- 2024-11-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3704631
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.26