Hardness of Approximate Diameter: Now for Undirected Graphs

Approximating the graph diameter is a basic task of both theoretical and practical interest. A simple folklore algorithm can output a 2-approximation to the diameter in linear time by running BFS from an arbitrary vertex. It has been open whether a better approximation is possible in near-linear time. A series of articles on fine-grained complexity have led to strong hardness results for diameter in directed graphs, culminating in a recent tradeoff curve independently discovered by [Li, STOC’21] and [Dalirrooyfard and Wein, STOC’21], showing that under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH), for any integer k ≥ 2 and δ > 0, a \(2-\frac{1}{k}-\delta\) approximation for diameter in directed m -edge graphs requires \(m^{1+1/(k-1)-o(1)}\) time. In particular, the simple linear time 2-approximation algorithm is optimal for directed graphs. In this article, we prove that the same tradeoff lower bound curve is possible for undirected graphs as well, extending results of [Roditty and Vassilevska W., STOC’13], [Li’20] and [Bonnet, ICALP’21] who proved the first few cases of the curve, k =2,3, and 4, respectively. Our result shows in particular that the simple linear time 2-approximation algorithm is conditionally optimal for undirected graphs. To obtain our result, we extract the core ideas in known reductions and introduce a unification and generalization that could be useful for proving SETH-based hardness for other problems in undirected graphs related to distance computation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the ACM
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3704631
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hardness of Approximate Diameter: Now for Undirected Graphs

Mina Dalirrooyfard, Virginia Vassilevska Williams, Ray Li
2 citations
Journal of the ACM
Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
1.26
article

Hardness of Approximate Diameter: Now for Undirected Graphs

Mina Dalirrooyfard, Virginia Vassilevska Williams, Ray Li
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Approximating the graph diameter is a basic task of both theoretical and practical interest. A simple folklore algorithm can output a 2-approximation to the diameter in linear time by running BFS from an arbitrary vertex. It has been open whether a better approximation is possible in near-linear time. A series of articles on fine-grained complexity have led to strong hardness results for diameter in directed graphs, culminating in a recent tradeoff curve independently discovered by [Li, STOC’21] and [Dalirrooyfard and Wein, STOC’21], showing that under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH), for any integer k ≥ 2 and δ > 0, a \(2-\frac{1}{k}-\delta\) approximation for diameter in directed m -edge graphs requires \(m^{1+1/(k-1)-o(1)}\) time. In particular, the simple linear time 2-approximation algorithm is optimal for directed graphs. In this article, we prove that the same tradeoff lower bound curve is possible for undirected graphs as well, extending results of [Roditty and Vassilevska W., STOC’13], [Li’20] and [Bonnet, ICALP’21] who proved the first few cases of the curve, k =2,3, and 4, respectively. Our result shows in particular that the simple linear time 2-approximation algorithm is conditionally optimal for undirected graphs. To obtain our result, we extract the core ideas in known reductions and introduce a unification and generalization that could be useful for proving SETH-based hardness for other problems in undirected graphs related to distance computation.

Journal of the ACMVol. 72(1)
Santa Clara University (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
1.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.