Engaging publics in science: a practical typology

Public engagement with science has become a prominent area of research and effort for democratizing science. In the fall of 2020, we held an online conference, Public Engagement with Science: Defining and Measuring Success, to address questions of how to do public engagement well. The conference was organized around conceptualizations of the publics engaged, with attendant epistemic, ethical, and political valences. We present here the typology of publics we used (volunteer, representative sample, stakeholder, and community publics), discuss the differences among those publics and what those differences mean for practice, and situate this typology within the existing work on public engagement with science. We then provide an overview of the essays published in this journal arising from the conference which provides a window into the rich work presented at the event.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Responsible Innovation
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2024.2419238
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engaging publics in science: a practical typology

Eleanor Louson, Megan K. Halpern, Heather Douglas
4 citations
Journal of Responsible Innovation
Climate Change Communication and Perception
4.53
article

Engaging publics in science: a practical typology

Eleanor Louson, Megan K. Halpern, Heather Douglas
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Public engagement with science has become a prominent area of research and effort for democratizing science. In the fall of 2020, we held an online conference, Public Engagement with Science: Defining and Measuring Success, to address questions of how to do public engagement well. The conference was organized around conceptualizations of the publics engaged, with attendant epistemic, ethical, and political valences. We present here the typology of publics we used (volunteer, representative sample, stakeholder, and community publics), discuss the differences among those publics and what those differences mean for practice, and situate this typology within the existing work on public engagement with science. We then provide an overview of the essays published in this journal arising from the conference which provides a window into the rich work presented at the event.

Journal of Responsible InnovationVol. 11(1)
Campbell Collaboration (NO), Michigan State University (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
4.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.