Volumetric analysis of Hand and Rotary instrumentation and Evaluation of Obturating material in Primary teeth using CBCT – A Clinical trial

Aims & Background: The biomechanical preparation is considered a critical step in the Pulpectomy procedure. The goal is to remove the microbiological contents in the canal and protect tooth function. In-vitro studies demonstrate that the shape of the root canal is more conical, favouring higher obturation quality and thereby increasing success rate using rotary files. So, this clinical trial aims to compare the volume of root canals before and after root canal instrumentation using hand and rotary files and to evaluate the flow of obturating material using CBCT in primary molars. Materials and Methods: This trial was conducted in 20 primary molars which were assigned to Group 1 (Hand files) and Group 2 (Rotary files). A CBCT was taken at 3 different intervals i.e., Prior to the procedure, After BMP, After the procedure. The difference between the Pre-instrumentation and Post-instrumentation CBCT images reveals the 3D volume change measured using hand and rotary files. Post-instrumentation and Post-obturation CBCT scans display the flow of root canal filling material in primary molars. Results: There were statistically significant differences noticed within Group 1 (p value = 0.000); and pre-instrumentation and post-instrumentation, pre-instrumentation and post-obturation in Group 2 (p value = 0.000). No statistically significant difference seen between post-instrumentation and post-obturation values (p value = 0.076). Significant differences were found in post-instrumentation and post-obturation volumes between groups. Conclusion: This trial concluded that rotary files led to a more productive funnel-shaped canal preparation that resulted in better obturation quality with minimal voids than hand files. Clinical significance: Rotary files using 3D imaging allowed more conservative and efficient root canal preparation while maintaining anatomy, resulting in superior three-dimensional obturation than hand files.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œBioscan.
Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63001/tbs.2024.v19.i02.s2.pp198-204
Primary Topic
Dental Research and COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Volumetric analysis of Hand and Rotary instrumentation and Evaluation of Obturating material in Primary teeth using CBCT – A Clinical trial

Arun Mamachan Xavier, Suresh Kumar J, Parvathy Kumaran, Malini Venugopal et al.
˜The œBioscan.
Dental Research and COVID-19
article

Volumetric analysis of Hand and Rotary instrumentation and Evaluation of Obturating material in Primary teeth using CBCT – A Clinical trial

Arun Mamachan Xavier, Suresh Kumar J, Parvathy Kumaran, Malini Venugopal, Nishna Thankappan, Anumukonda Rohitha Sravya, Balagopal Varma R
article en

Abstract

Aims & Background: The biomechanical preparation is considered a critical step in the Pulpectomy procedure. The goal is to remove the microbiological contents in the canal and protect tooth function. In-vitro studies demonstrate that the shape of the root canal is more conical, favouring higher obturation quality and thereby increasing success rate using rotary files. So, this clinical trial aims to compare the volume of root canals before and after root canal instrumentation using hand and rotary files and to evaluate the flow of obturating material using CBCT in primary molars. Materials and Methods: This trial was conducted in 20 primary molars which were assigned to Group 1 (Hand files) and Group 2 (Rotary files). A CBCT was taken at 3 different intervals i.e., Prior to the procedure, After BMP, After the procedure. The difference between the Pre-instrumentation and Post-instrumentation CBCT images reveals the 3D volume change measured using hand and rotary files. Post-instrumentation and Post-obturation CBCT scans display the flow of root canal filling material in primary molars. Results: There were statistically significant differences noticed within Group 1 (p value = 0.000); and pre-instrumentation and post-instrumentation, pre-instrumentation and post-obturation in Group 2 (p value = 0.000). No statistically significant difference seen between post-instrumentation and post-obturation values (p value = 0.076). Significant differences were found in post-instrumentation and post-obturation volumes between groups. Conclusion: This trial concluded that rotary files led to a more productive funnel-shaped canal preparation that resulted in better obturation quality with minimal voids than hand files. Clinical significance: Rotary files using 3D imaging allowed more conservative and efficient root canal preparation while maintaining anatomy, resulting in superior three-dimensional obturation than hand files.

˜The œBioscan.Vol. 19(Supplement 2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Dental Research and COVID-19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.