Methodological and reporting quality of systematic and rapid reviews on human mpox and their utility during a public health emergency
Evidence syntheses take time to produce and during an emergent outbreak they are often outdated at the time of publication and suffer from poor adherence to methodological and reporting guidelines. Overlapping content and few new studies resulted in minimal added value to the mpox literature. Strategies to reduce duplication and mechanisms to produce and disseminate continuously updated living evidence syntheses need to be explored to support decision-makers responding to an emergency.
Authors
- Tricia Corrin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5514-1589)
- Mavra Qamar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5152-1506)
- Austyn Baumeister
- Lisa Waddell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4887-5124)
- Kusala Pussegoda (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8383-827X)
- Melanie Sterian
- Anmol Samra
- Izza Israr
Institutions
- Public Health Agency of Canada (CA)
- University of Guelph (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods
- Published
- 2024-11-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cesm.70005
- Primary Topic
- Poxvirus research and outbreaks
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00