Evaluation of ChatGPT 4.0 in Thoracic Imaging and Diagnostics

Recent advancements in natural language processing (NLP) have profoundly transformed the medical industry, enhancing large cohort data analysis, improving diagnostic capabilities, and streamlining clinical workflows. Among the leading tools in this domain is ChatGPT 4.0 (OpenAI, San Francisco, California, US), a commercial NLP model widely used across various applications. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of ChatGPT 4.0 specifically in thoracic imaging by assessing its ability to answer diagnostic questions related to this field. We utilized the model to respond to multiple-choice questions derived from thoracic imaging scenarios, followed by rigorous statistical analysis to assess its accuracy and variability across different subgroups. Our analysis revealed significant variability across different subgroups. Overall, the model achieved an impressive accuracy of 84.9% in diagnosing thoracic radiology questions. It excelled in terminology and diagnostic signs, achieving perfect scores, and demonstrated strong performance in the intensive care and normal anatomy categories, with accuracies of 90% and 80%, respectively. In pathology subgroups, ChatGPT achieved an average accuracy of 89.1%, particularly excelling in diagnosing infectious pneumonia and atelectasis, though it scored lower in diffuse alveolar disease (66.7%). For disease-related questions, the mean accuracy was 79.1%, with perfect scores in several specific subcategories. However, accuracy was notably lower for vascular disease (50%) and lung cancer (66.7%). In conclusion, while ChatGPT 4.0 shows strong potential in diagnosing thoracic conditions, the variability identified underscores the necessity for ongoing research and refinement of its transformer architecture. This will enhance its reliability and applicability in broader clinical and patient care settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.73741
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of ChatGPT 4.0 in Thoracic Imaging and Diagnostics

Keyur Parekh, Pokhraj P Suthar, Mohammed Abdul Sami, Golnaz Lotfian
4 citations
Cureus
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
1.62
article

Evaluation of ChatGPT 4.0 in Thoracic Imaging and Diagnostics

Keyur Parekh, Pokhraj P Suthar, Mohammed Abdul Sami, Golnaz Lotfian
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Recent advancements in natural language processing (NLP) have profoundly transformed the medical industry, enhancing large cohort data analysis, improving diagnostic capabilities, and streamlining clinical workflows. Among the leading tools in this domain is ChatGPT 4.0 (OpenAI, San Francisco, California, US), a commercial NLP model widely used across various applications. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of ChatGPT 4.0 specifically in thoracic imaging by assessing its ability to answer diagnostic questions related to this field. We utilized the model to respond to multiple-choice questions derived from thoracic imaging scenarios, followed by rigorous statistical analysis to assess its accuracy and variability across different subgroups. Our analysis revealed significant variability across different subgroups. Overall, the model achieved an impressive accuracy of 84.9% in diagnosing thoracic radiology questions. It excelled in terminology and diagnostic signs, achieving perfect scores, and demonstrated strong performance in the intensive care and normal anatomy categories, with accuracies of 90% and 80%, respectively. In pathology subgroups, ChatGPT achieved an average accuracy of 89.1%, particularly excelling in diagnosing infectious pneumonia and atelectasis, though it scored lower in diffuse alveolar disease (66.7%). For disease-related questions, the mean accuracy was 79.1%, with perfect scores in several specific subcategories. However, accuracy was notably lower for vascular disease (50%) and lung cancer (66.7%). In conclusion, while ChatGPT 4.0 shows strong potential in diagnosing thoracic conditions, the variability identified underscores the necessity for ongoing research and refinement of its transformer architecture. This will enhance its reliability and applicability in broader clinical and patient care settings.

CureusVol. 16(11)
Rush University Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
1.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of ChatGPT 4.0 in Thoracic Imaging and Diagnostics — Keyur Parekh, Pokhraj P Suthar, et al. · Cureus (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS