When terrorists attempt politics: an evaluation of Lashkar-e-Taiba’s pursuit of political transformation

In recent years, the United Nations (UN) designated terrorist organization Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), a group with links to the Pakistani security establishment, has been pursuing a strategy of political transition. This paper explores whether existing counter-terrorism frameworks such as the UN-led disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) and state-led de-radicalization and disengagement programs adequately explain the transition of terrorist organizations into the political arena. It is argued that a lack of organizational consensus, the failure to evolve an ideological consensus for renouncing violence and endorsing democracy, and unpromising domestic and international political environments are the strongest predictors of difficulties in achieving successful transformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Small Wars and Insurgencies
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2024.2423315
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When terrorists attempt politics: an evaluation of Lashkar-e-Taiba’s pursuit of political transformation

Khuram Iqbal, Syed Adnan Ali Shah Bukhari, Julian Droogan
1 citations
Small Wars and Insurgencies
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
2.23
article

When terrorists attempt politics: an evaluation of Lashkar-e-Taiba’s pursuit of political transformation

Khuram Iqbal, Syed Adnan Ali Shah Bukhari, Julian Droogan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In recent years, the United Nations (UN) designated terrorist organization Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), a group with links to the Pakistani security establishment, has been pursuing a strategy of political transition. This paper explores whether existing counter-terrorism frameworks such as the UN-led disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) and state-led de-radicalization and disengagement programs adequately explain the transition of terrorist organizations into the political arena. It is argued that a lack of organizational consensus, the failure to evolve an ideological consensus for renouncing violence and endorsing democracy, and unpromising domestic and international political environments are the strongest predictors of difficulties in achieving successful transformation.

Small Wars and InsurgenciesVol. 36(2)
Academy of Public Administration (AZ), National Defence University (PK), Macquarie University (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.