Are AI tools better than traditional tools in literature searching? Evidence from E-commerce research

This article examines the potential implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for literature search, comparing AI-based tools to conventional research methods. It also addresses the scarcity of academic literature on specific AI tools for research writing, posing four critical questions regarding accuracy, quality, uniqueness, and qualified uniqueness. Employing Algorithmic Theory and Data Dependency Theory, this project scrutinizes AI performance in algorithms, machine learning models, and data quality. Testing nine e-commerce topics using Scopus, Web of Science, Elicit, and SciSpace, the authors conclude that while conventional methods excel in accuracy and quality, AI tools show promise in uniqueness, complementing literature reviews. The findings also emphasize the judicious integration of AI tools and advocate for further research into new applications and diverse fields. Ultimately, this research offers highly relevant insights into leveraging AI tools to enhance conventional literature search practices in research and professional domains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006241295802
Citations
11
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are AI tools better than traditional tools in literature searching? Evidence from E-commerce research

Philipp Brüggemann, Maria Petrescu, Przemysław Tomczyk, Niklas Mergner
11 citations
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
AI in Service Interactions
3.82
article

Are AI tools better than traditional tools in literature searching? Evidence from E-commerce research

Philipp Brüggemann, Maria Petrescu, Przemysław Tomczyk, Niklas Mergner
article en
11 citations

Abstract

This article examines the potential implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for literature search, comparing AI-based tools to conventional research methods. It also addresses the scarcity of academic literature on specific AI tools for research writing, posing four critical questions regarding accuracy, quality, uniqueness, and qualified uniqueness. Employing Algorithmic Theory and Data Dependency Theory, this project scrutinizes AI performance in algorithms, machine learning models, and data quality. Testing nine e-commerce topics using Scopus, Web of Science, Elicit, and SciSpace, the authors conclude that while conventional methods excel in accuracy and quality, AI tools show promise in uniqueness, complementing literature reviews. The findings also emphasize the judicious integration of AI tools and advocate for further research into new applications and diverse fields. Ultimately, this research offers highly relevant insights into leveraging AI tools to enhance conventional literature search practices in research and professional domains.

Journal of Librarianship and Information ScienceVol. 58(1)
Kozminski University (PL), FernUniversität in Hagen (DE), Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
AI in Service Interactions
3.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.