Not only blonde hair

Women are affected from the so-called Gender Science Stereotype (GSS) according to which they are always considered as less competent than men in scientific fields for the only reason of being women, hence being obstacled and discriminated while pursuing that career. The scope of this study is to test whether some well-known stereotypes, such as the ‚dumb blonde‘ (i.e., blonde women are considered dumb or naïve), could explicitly effect the GSS and how they interact with each other. To investigate this, we manipulated pictures of a woman (Exp. 1) and a man (Exp. 2), by modifying (i) hair colour; (ii) hair length; (iii) glasses and (iv) make-up (Exp.1 ) or beard (Exp. 2), obtaining in this way 36 pictures for each experiment (3x3x2x2). Each picture was presented twice, once associated with a scientific text and once with a novel. Here we are presenting preliminary data, where participants (n = 45) were asked to evaluate, on a 10-points Likert scale, the authorship’s likelihood. Results show a negative effect of blonde hair (‘’dumb blonde’’) for both genders and heavy make-up for women, as well as a positive effect of glasses for both genders and of beard for men. Interestingly, although no gender-science stereotype has been found for women (Exp. 1), this emerged in Exp. 2. The interaction between scientific genre and make-up for women show that this stereotype is present when enhanced by other factors, such as the “highly” feminising effect of make-up. These results are discussed considering both perceptual and social theories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psihološka obzorja
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20419/2024.33.598
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.94

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not only blonde hair

Federico Paulesu, Rossana Actis-Grosso
2 citations
Psihološka obzorja
Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes
0.94
article

Not only blonde hair

Federico Paulesu, Rossana Actis-Grosso
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Women are affected from the so-called Gender Science Stereotype (GSS) according to which they are always considered as less competent than men in scientific fields for the only reason of being women, hence being obstacled and discriminated while pursuing that career. The scope of this study is to test whether some well-known stereotypes, such as the ‚dumb blonde‘ (i.e., blonde women are considered dumb or naïve), could explicitly effect the GSS and how they interact with each other. To investigate this, we manipulated pictures of a woman (Exp. 1) and a man (Exp. 2), by modifying (i) hair colour; (ii) hair length; (iii) glasses and (iv) make-up (Exp.1 ) or beard (Exp. 2), obtaining in this way 36 pictures for each experiment (3x3x2x2). Each picture was presented twice, once associated with a scientific text and once with a novel. Here we are presenting preliminary data, where participants (n = 45) were asked to evaluate, on a 10-points Likert scale, the authorship’s likelihood. Results show a negative effect of blonde hair (‘’dumb blonde’’) for both genders and heavy make-up for women, as well as a positive effect of glasses for both genders and of beard for men. Interestingly, although no gender-science stereotype has been found for women (Exp. 1), this emerged in Exp. 2. The interaction between scientific genre and make-up for women show that this stereotype is present when enhanced by other factors, such as the “highly” feminising effect of make-up. These results are discussed considering both perceptual and social theories.

Psihološka obzorjaVol. 33
University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes
0.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.