Radiation Oncology Residency Training in Saudi Arabia: Direction in Attaining Competencies

Introduction Radiotherapy is a cornerstone in cancer treatment as a part of multidisciplinary team management. The field has evolved significantly over the past two decades due to technological advancement. To meet the increased need for manpower in the field, the radiation oncology residency program was first established in Saudi Arabia back in 2019. Purpose We sought to survey the trainees' current experience across the country to establish a baseline for the different training aspects and to tackle any challenges that might go unnoticed. Materials and methods This is a cross-sectional survey-based study that targeted all residents enrolled in the Saudi radiation oncology training program, except the first-year residents. The trainees received an anonymous online questionnaire aiming to assess their involvement in every aspect of the daily workflow. Results A total of 13 eligible radiation oncology residents in Saudi Arabia were included. Eleven residents completed the survey with a national response rate of 85%. Nine (82%) of the trainees reported that they review the contours and the treatment plans with their attendings in person and this method of review is the preferred one over the hybrid method as it provides better teaching quality, interactivity, and prompt feedback. Most respondents do not review offline (7, 64%) or online (6, 55%) cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans with their attendings, citing the limited involvement in the approval process. Conclusion This study uncovered a need for better resident integration into day-to-day clinical workflow, particularly in CBCT review and approval. Addressing the current concerns will enhance the educational experience and future practice. Acknowledging the limitations of our study, we observed that certain deficiencies in core competencies reported in long-established North American programs align with our findings. This underscores the need for addressing these gaps through continuous and unbiased evaluations of radiation oncology residency training programs to enhance the educational experience and ensure high-quality preparation for independent practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.73754
Primary Topic
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radiation Oncology Residency Training in Saudi Arabia: Direction in Attaining Competencies

Yasir Alayed, Amna Mohaimeed, Firas Almomen, Mohammed Aldehaim et al.
Cureus
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
article

Radiation Oncology Residency Training in Saudi Arabia: Direction in Attaining Competencies

Yasir Alayed, Amna Mohaimeed, Firas Almomen, Mohammed Aldehaim, Saif Aljabab, A.M. Alswilem, Abdullah Alsuhaibani, Bedoor Saud Julaidan
article en

Abstract

Introduction Radiotherapy is a cornerstone in cancer treatment as a part of multidisciplinary team management. The field has evolved significantly over the past two decades due to technological advancement. To meet the increased need for manpower in the field, the radiation oncology residency program was first established in Saudi Arabia back in 2019. Purpose We sought to survey the trainees' current experience across the country to establish a baseline for the different training aspects and to tackle any challenges that might go unnoticed. Materials and methods This is a cross-sectional survey-based study that targeted all residents enrolled in the Saudi radiation oncology training program, except the first-year residents. The trainees received an anonymous online questionnaire aiming to assess their involvement in every aspect of the daily workflow. Results A total of 13 eligible radiation oncology residents in Saudi Arabia were included. Eleven residents completed the survey with a national response rate of 85%. Nine (82%) of the trainees reported that they review the contours and the treatment plans with their attendings in person and this method of review is the preferred one over the hybrid method as it provides better teaching quality, interactivity, and prompt feedback. Most respondents do not review offline (7, 64%) or online (6, 55%) cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans with their attendings, citing the limited involvement in the approval process. Conclusion This study uncovered a need for better resident integration into day-to-day clinical workflow, particularly in CBCT review and approval. Addressing the current concerns will enhance the educational experience and future practice. Acknowledging the limitations of our study, we observed that certain deficiencies in core competencies reported in long-established North American programs align with our findings. This underscores the need for addressing these gaps through continuous and unbiased evaluations of radiation oncology residency training programs to enhance the educational experience and ensure high-quality preparation for independent practice.

CureusVol. 16(11)
Alfaisal University (SA), King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (SA), King Saud Medical City (SA), King Saud University (SA), King Faisal University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.